ArticleBMC public health2013
Assessment of total cardiovascular risk using WHO/ISH risk prediction charts in three low and middle income countries in Asia.
Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03512691 (The Nueva Ecija Cardiovascular Risk Experiment), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Nueva Ecija Cardiovascular Risk Experiment: An Evaluation of the Impact of Risk Information and Screening on Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- The significance of the WHO/ISH absolute cardiovascular risk prediction scores among recent stroke survivors in Ghana-Insights from the PINGS2 multicenter study.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mapping and evaluation of global and country-specific cardiovascular disease risk prediction models.Future cardiology · 2026Review
- The Significance of the WHO/ISH Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Scores among Recent Stroke Survivors in Ghana-Insights from the PINGS2 multicenter study.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- Ten-year risk of cardiovascular events among the adult population of West Tripura District of India by the Framingham risk score: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- The prevalence of the risk factors associated with cardiovascular diseases among Iranian adults: Findings of a cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Risk estimation of cardiovascular diseases using the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk prediction charts in the Azar cohort population: Cross-sectional study.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Asymptomatic cerebral small vessel disease in adults with low cardiovascular risk.BMJ neurology open · 2023Article
- Socioemotional Factors and Cardiovascular Risk: What Is the Relationship in Brazilian Older Adults?Innovation in aging · 2023Article
- Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Obesity and its associated factors among older adults: MyHEBAT (Health science reports · 2022Article
- Absolute cardiovascular risk scores and medication use in rural India: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular risk assessment tools in Asia.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
- Task shifting of cardiovascular disease risk assessment to Anganwadi Worker in Northern India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Long-term testosterone replacement therapy reduces fatigue in men with hypogonadism.Drugs in context · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent research has used cardiovascular risk scores intended to estimate "total cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk" in individuals to assess the distribution of risk within populations. The research suggested that the adoption of the total risk approach, in comparison to treatment decisions being based on the level of a single risk factor, could lead to reductions in expenditure on preventive cardiovascular drug treatment in low- and middle-income countries. So that the patient benefit associated with savings is highlighted.
methodsThis study used data from national STEPS surveys (STEPwise Approach to Surveillance) conducted between 2005 and 2010 in Cambodia, Malaysia and Mongolia of men and women aged 40-64 years. The study compared the differences and implications of various approaches to risk estimation at a population level using the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) risk score charts. To aid interpretation and adjustment of scores and inform treatment in individuals, the charts are accompanied by practice notes about risk factors not included in the risk score calculations. Total risk was calculated amongst the populations using the charts alone and also adjusted according to these notes. Prevalence of traditional single risk factors was also calculated.
resultsThe prevalence of WHO/ISH "high CVD risk" (≥20% chance of developing a cardiovascular event over 10 years) of 6%, 2.3% and 1.3% in Mongolia, Malaysia and Cambodia, respectively, is in line with recent research when charts alone are used. However, these proportions rise to 33.3%, 20.8% and 10.4%, respectively when individuals with blood pressure > = 160/100 mm/Hg and/or hypertension medication are attributed to "high risk". Of those at "moderate risk" (10- < 20% chance of developing a cardio vascular event over 10 years), 100%, 94.3% and 30.1%, respectively are affected by at least one risk-increasing factor. Of all individuals, 44.6%, 29.0% and 15.0% are affected by hypertension as a single risk factor (systolic ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg or medication).
conclusionsUsed on a population level, cardiovascular risk scores may offer useful insights that can assist health service delivery planning. An approach based on overall risk without adjustment of specific risk factors however, may underestimate treatment needs.At the individual level, the total risk approach offers important clinical benefits. However, countries need to develop appropriate clinical guidelines and operational guidance for detection and management of CVD risk using total CVD-risk approach at different levels of health system. Operational research is needed to assess implementation issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.