ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2014
The evolving small-molecule fluorescent-conjugate toolbox for Class A GPCRs.
Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CXXI. Apelin receptor pharmacology in the human cardiovascular system and emerging clinical applications.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Light-Based Molecular Tools to Precisely Monitor and Operate β-Adrenoceptors.Medicinal research reviews · 2026Review
- Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of New δ Opioid Receptor-Selective Fluorescent Probes and Applications in Single-Molecule Microscopy of Wild-Type Receptors.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Innovative Approaches for Drug Discovery: Quantifying Drug Distribution and Response with Raman Imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Development of a Fluorescently Labeled Ligand for Rapid Detection of DAT in Human and Mouse Peripheral Blood Monocytes.JACS Au · 2024Article
- Target-based drug discovery: Applications of fluorescence techniques in high throughput and fragment-based screening.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Design, Synthesis, and Application of Fluorescent Ligands Targeting the Intracellular Allosteric Binding Site of the CXC Chemokine Receptor 2.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Development and Characterization of Potent Succinate Receptor Fluorescent Tracers.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Expanding the apelin receptor pharmacological toolbox using novel fluorescent ligands.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Optimization of Peptide Linker-Based Fluorescent Ligands for the Histamine HJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Yeast-based directed-evolution for high-throughput structural stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- An Integrated Approach toward NanoBRET Tracers for Analysis of GPCR Ligand Engagement.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Detection of genome-edited and endogenously expressed G protein-coupled receptors.The FEBS journal · 2021Review
- The right tools for the job: the central role for next generation chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution methods in phenotypic drug discovery.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2021Review
- Ligand-directed covalent labelling of a GPCR with a fluorescent tag in live cells.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Fluorescent small-molecule agonists as follicle-stimulating hormone receptor imaging tools.RSC chemical biology · 2020Article
- Differently fluorescence-labelled dibenzodiazepinone-type muscarinic acetylcholine receptor ligands with high MRSC medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
- Fluorescent ligands: Bringing light to emerging GPCR paradigms.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Review
- Chemical Probes for the Adenosine Receptors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- A live cell NanoBRET binding assay allows the study of ligand-binding kinetics to the adenosine APurinergic signalling · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed fluorescently tagged drug molecules gaining significant attraction in their use as pharmacological tools with which to visualize and interrogate receptor targets at the single-cell level. Additionally, one can generate detailed pharmacological information, such as affinity measurements, down to almost single-molecule detection limits. The now accepted utilization of fluorescence-based readouts in high-throughput/high-content screening provides further evidence that fluorescent molecules offer a safer and more adaptable substitute to radioligands in molecular pharmacology and drug discovery. One such drug-target family that has received considerable attention are the GPCRs; this review therefore summarizes the most recent developments in the area of fluorescent ligand design for this important drug target. We assess recently reported fluorescent conjugates by adopting a receptor-family-based approach, highlighting some of the strengths and weaknesses of the individual molecules and their subsequent use. This review adds further strength to the arguments that fluorescent ligand design and synthesis requires careful planning and execution; providing examples illustrating that selection of the correct fluorescent dye, linker length/composition and geographic attachment point to the drug scaffold can all influence the ultimate selectivity and potency of the final conjugate when compared with its unlabelled precursor. When optimized appropriately, the resultant fluorescent conjugates have been successfully employed in an array of assay formats, including flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, FRET and scanning confocal microscopy. It is clear that fluorescently labelled GPCR ligands remain a developing and dynamic research arena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.