ArticleOncoimmunology2013
Trial watch: DNA vaccines for cancer therapy.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facts and Hopes: CAR T-Cell Therapy and Immune Contexture in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Review
- Digital Pathology for Better Clinical Practice.Cancers · 2024Review
- Principles of risk assessment in colon cancer: immunity is key.Oncoimmunology · 2024Review
- Redefining the battle against colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of emerging immunotherapies and their clinical efficacy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Light on life: immunoscore immune-checkpoint, a predictor of immunotherapy response.Oncoimmunology · 2023Review
- An Overview of Nanomaterial Applications in Pharmacology.BioMed research international · 2023Review
- License to kill: microsatellite instability and immune contexture.Oncoimmunology · 2021Article
- The immune contexture and Immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2020Review
- Nanoparticle cancer vaccines: Design considerations and recent advances.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020Review
- Advances in Designing and Developing Vaccines, Drugs and Therapeutic Approaches to Counter Human Papilloma Virus.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Safety and efficacy of p62 DNA vaccine ELENAGEN in a first-in-human trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- CSPG4: a prototype oncoantigen for translational immunotherapy studies.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Phase I clinical trial of idiotypic DNA vaccine administered as a complex with polyethylenimine to patients with B-cell lymphoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Coadministration of a Plasmid Encoding HIV-1 Gag Enhances the Efficacy of Cancer DNA Vaccines.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016Article
- Trial Watch-Immunostimulation with cytokines in cancer therapy.Oncoimmunology · 2016Review
- Fusion of the dendritic cell-targeting chemokine MIP3α to melanoma antigen Gp100 in a therapeutic DNA vaccine significantly enhances immunogenicity and survival in a mouse melanoma model.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2016Article
- Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems Designed to Improve Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy.Vaccines · 2015Review
- Vaccines, Adjuvants, and Dendritic Cell Activators--Current Status and Future Challenges.Seminars in oncology · 2015Review
- Induction of HER2 Immunity in Outbred Domestic Cats by DNA Electrovaccination.Cancer immunology research · 2015Article
- Trial watch: Naked and vectored DNA-based anticancer vaccines.Oncoimmunology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The foundation of modern vaccinology dates back to the 1790s, when the English physician Edward Jenner uncovered the tremendous medical potential of prophylactic vaccination. Jenner's work ignited a wave of nationwide vaccination campaigns abating the incidence of multiple life-threatening infectious diseases and culminating with the eradication of natural smallpox virus, which was definitively certified by the WHO in 1980. The possibility of using vaccines against cancer was first proposed at the end of the 19th century by Paul Ehrlich and William Coley. However, it was not until the 1990s that such a hypothesis began to be intensively investigated, following the realization that the immune system is not completely unresponsive to tumors and that neoplastic cells express immunogenic tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Nowadays, anticancer vaccines are rapidly moving from the bench to the bedside, and a few prophylactic and therapeutic preparations have already been approved by FDA for use in humans. In this setting, one interesting approach is constituted by DNA vaccines, i.e., TAA-encoding circularized DNA constructs, often of bacterial origin, that are delivered to patients as such or by means of specific vectors, including (but not limited to) liposomal preparations, nanoparticles, bacteria and viruses. The administration of DNA vaccines is most often performed via the intramuscular or subcutaneous route and is expected to cause (1) the endogenous synthesis of the TAA by myocytes and/or resident antigen-presenting cells; (2) the presentation of TAA-derived peptides on the cell surface, in association with MHC class I molecules; and (3) the activation of potentially therapeutic tumor-specific immune responses. In this Trial Watch, we will summarize the results of recent clinical trials that have evaluated/are evaluating DNA vaccines as therapeutic interventions against cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.