Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23734299›Full record

ArticleMobile genetic elements2013

Revisiting bacterial phylogeny: Natural and experimental evidence for horizontal gene transfer of 16S rRNA.

Kei Kitahara, Kentaro Miyazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile genetic elements, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Isolation and Genomics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Screening and Molecular Identification of Bacteria from the Midgut ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kei KitaharaBioproduction Research Institute; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST); Sapporo, Japan.
Kentaro Miyazaki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods used for phylogenetic classification of prokaryotes largely rely on the sequences of 16S rRNA genes that are ubiquitously present in the cell. Theoretical basis of this methodology is based on the assumption that 16S rRNA genes are only vertically inherited and are thus indigenous to each species. However, microbial genomic analysis has revealed the existence of prokaryotic species containing two types of rRNA (

Indexed as

16S ribosomal RNAcomplexity hypothesishorizontal gene transferphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID23734299
PMCPMC3661144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.