Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23734236›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Environment exploration and colonization behavior of the pea aphid associated with the expression of the foraging gene.

Sophie Tarès, Laury Arthaud, Marcel Amichot, Alain Robichon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TheLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie TarèsINRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), UMR 1355 Institut Sophia Agrobiotech, Sophia-Antipolis, France. sophie.tares@sophia.inra.fr
Laury Arthaud
Marcel Amichot
Alain Robichon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphids respond to specific environmental cues by producing alternative morphs, a phenomenon called polyphenism, but also by modulating their individual behavior even within the same morph. This complex plasticity allows a rapid adaptation of individuals to fluctuating environmental conditions, but the underlying genetic and molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. The foraging gene is known to be associated with behavior in various species and has been shown to mediate the behavioral shift induced by environmental changes in some insects. In this study, we investigated the function of this gene in the clonal forms of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum by identifying and cloning cDNA variants, as well as analyzing their expression levels in developmental morphs and behavioral variants. Our results indicate that the expression of foraging changes at key steps of the aphid development. This gene is also highly expressed in sedentary wingless adult morphs reared under crowded conditions, probably just before they start walking and foraging. The cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) enzyme activity measured in the behavioral variants correlates with the level of foraging expression. Altogether, our results suggest that foraging could act to promote the shift from a sedentary to an exploratory behavior, being thus involved in the behavioral plasticity of the pea aphid.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAphidsBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernCloning, MolecularCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesDNA, ComplementaryExploratory BehaviorGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicInsect ProteinsIsoenzymesMolecular Sequence DataPisum sativumCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesDNA, ComplementaryInsect ProteinsIsoenzymes

Identifiers

PMID23734236
PMCPMC3667181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.