Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23734083›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2013

Mutational screening of Indian families with hereditary congenital cataract.

Surya Prakash Goud Ponnam, Kekkunaya Ramesha, Jyoti Matalia, Sushma Tejwani, Balasubramanya Ramamurthy, Chitra Kannabiran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sensitive periods for the functional specialization of the neural system for human face processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Identification of co-segregatingFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Dual diagnosis ofRare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  5. Connexin Mutations and Hereditary Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Biallelic Variants inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of a Missense Mutation inJournal of current ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Surya Prakash Goud PonnamKallam Anji Reddy Molecular Genetics Laboratory, L V Prasad Eye Institute, KAR Campus, Banjara Hills Road No.2, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kekkunaya Ramesha
Jyoti Matalia
Sushma Tejwani
Balasubramanya Ramamurthy
Chitra Kannabiran
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo screen for pathogenic mutations in ten candidate genes in Indian families diagnosed with autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant cataracts.

methodsFamilies with two or more affected individuals with bilateral familial congenital/developmental cataract were ophthalmically evaluated, and blood samples were obtained. Genomic DNA extracted from the blood leukocytes was screened with PCR amplification of the exons and the flanking intronic regions of various genes selected for analysis. The amplified products were subjected to single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. The variants in SSCP analysis were subjected to bidirectional sequencing by automated methods.

resultsWe identified four novel sequence changes that cosegregated with the disease phenotype in each family and were absent in at least 50 ethnically matched unrelated normal controls. These changes include a homozygous missense change of c.649G>A (Val196Met) in GJA8/connexin 50 (Cx50) in a family with autosomal recessive cataract, two heterozygous missense changes, c.658C>T (Pro199Ser) in GJA8/Cx50 and c.589C>T (Pro197Ser) in GJA3/connexin 46 (Cx46) in two separate families with autosomal dominant cataract, and a silent change ( c.84G>A/p.Val28Val, predicted to result in the creation of a new potential branch point) in GJA8 one family with an autosomal dominant inheritance of cataract. Of the four novel mutations identified, three mutations, Val196Met (GJA8), Pro199Ser (GJA8), and Pro197Ser (GJA3), are predicted to be in the second extracellular domain of the respective connexin proteins.

conclusionsOur report extends the mutation spectrum of connexin genes GJA8 and GJA3 and confirms that connexin genes are among the most frequently mutated genes in hereditary cataracts. Our results suggest that connexin gene (GJA8 and GJA3) mutations occur in approximately 10% (4/40 families) of families with congenital hereditary cataracts in a population from southern India.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic TestingAmino Acid SubstitutionBase SequenceCataractConnexin 50ConnexinsEye ProteinsFamilyFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMolecular Sequence DataPedigreeConnexin 50ConnexinsEye ProteinsGJA3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23734083
PMCPMC3669530
OpenAlexW66868711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.