Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2014
Duloxetine use in chronic painful conditions--individual patient data responder analysis.
Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02652988 (Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Patients. Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 45 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Patients. Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Clinical Trial
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 45 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Antidepressants for hip and knee osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Mirtazapine for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Antidepressants for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for cancer-related pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Opioids for cancer-related pain in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Tramadol for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- [General treatment principles, coordination of care and patient education in fibromyalgia syndrome : Updated guidelines 2017 and overview of systematic review articles].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Pooled it
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuloxetine has been studied in four distinct chronic pain conditions - osteoarthritis (OA), fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain (CLBP) and diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). These trials have involved large numbers of patients with at least moderate pain, and have used similar methods for recording pain intensity, over about 12 weeks.
methodsData from the trials were pooled according to painful condition, and reanalysed at the level of the individual patient and using increasing levels of pain intensity reduction (<15%, 15-29%, 30-49%, ≥ 50%), with different imputation methods on withdrawal.
resultsThe proportion of patients recording at least 50% pain intensity reduction plateaued after 2-6 weeks in fibromyalgia, and 8-12 weeks in other conditions. The duloxetine-specific benefit [number needed to treat (NNT) for at least 50% pain intensity reduction] was fairly constant after about 2 weeks for DPNP and fibromyalgia and after about 4 or 5 weeks for OA and CLBP. In all conditions, responses were bimodal, with patients generally experiencing either very good or very poor pain relief. Last-observation-carried-forward imputation produced numerically and occasionally statistically better (lower) NNTs than use of baseline-observation-carried-forward (true response).
conclusionsBaseline-observation-carried-forward (true response), which combines the success of high levels of pain relief with the failure to experience pain relief on withdrawal of the drug is conservative and probably reflective of clinical practice experience. The distribution of effect was not normal; few patients had the average response and averages are not an appropriate descriptor for these data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.