Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23733403›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2013

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily memantine (28 mg): a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease taking cholinesterase inhibitors.

George T Grossberg, Facundo Manes, Ricardo F Allegri, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo, Sergio Gloger, Lei Xie, X Daniel Jia, Vojislav Pejović, Michael L Miller, James L Perhach and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00322153 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00322153 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type

TypeinterventionalSponsorForest LaboratoriesRan2005 to 2008Enrolled677ConditionsDementia of the Alzheimer's TypeArmsmemantine ER, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Memantine for dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  10. Efficacy and adverse effects of memantine treatment for Alzheimer's disease from randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Effect of memantine on cough reflex sensitivity: translational studies in guinea pigs and humans.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2015
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neuroprotective Effects of Tectoridin in HNeurochemical research · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

George T GrossbergDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1438 S. Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. grossbgt@slu.edu
Facundo Manes
Ricardo F Allegri
Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo
Sergio Gloger
Lei Xie
X Daniel Jia
Vojislav Pejović
Michael L Miller
James L Perhach
Stephen M Graham
Prescott College · USFundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia · ARInstituto de Neurología Cognitiva · ARInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MXOncoMed (United States) · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmediate-release memantine (10 mg, twice daily) is approved in the USA for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a higher-dose, once-daily, extended-release formulation in patients with moderate-to-severe AD concurrently taking cholinesterase inhibitors.

methodsIn this 24-week, double-blind, multinational study (NCT00322153), outpatients with AD (Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 3-14) were randomized to receive once-daily, 28-mg, extended-release memantine or placebo. Co-primary efficacy parameters were the baseline-to-endpoint score change on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) and the endpoint score on the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus). The secondary efficacy parameter was the baseline-to-endpoint score change on the 19-item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19); additional parameters included the baseline-to-endpoint score changes on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and verbal fluency test. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of covariance model, except for CIBIC-Plus (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Safety and tolerability were assessed through adverse events and physical and laboratory examinations.

resultsA total of 677 patients were randomized to receive extended-release memantine (n = 342) or placebo (n = 335); completion rates were 79.8 and 81.2 %, respectively. At endpoint (week 24, last observation carried forward), memantine-treated patients significantly outperformed placebo-treated patients on the SIB (least squares mean difference [95 % CI] 2.6 [1.0, 4.2]; p = 0.001), CIBIC-Plus (p = 0.008), NPI (p = 0.005), and verbal fluency test (p = 0.004); the effect did not achieve significance on ADCS-ADL19 (p = 0.177). Adverse events with a frequency of ≥5.0 % that were more prevalent in the memantine group were headache (5.6 vs. 5.1 %) and diarrhea (5.0 vs. 3.9 %).

conclusionExtended-release memantine was efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in this population.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseArgentinaCholinesterase InhibitorsDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMemantineMexicoSeverity of Illness IndexCholinesterase InhibitorsDelayed-Action PreparationsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMemantine

Identifiers

PMID23733403
PMCPMC3680656
OpenAlexW2009141508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.