ArticleInvestigational new drugs2014
2-Aminothiophene-3-carboxylic acid ester derivatives as novel highly selective cytostatic agents.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Evaluation of the toxicity of 5-aryl-2-aminoimidazole-based biofilm inhibitors against eukaryotic cell lines, bone cells and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytostatic agents often do not discriminate in their cytostatic potential between different tumor cell types in vitro. In this study, several 2-aminothiophene-3-carboxylic acid ester derivatives were discovered that show an unusual cytostatic selectivity for several T-cell (but not B-cell) lymphoma, prostate cancer, kidney carcinoma and hepatoma cell lines. Their 50 % cytostatic concentrations were generally in the higher nanomolar range and were approximately 20- to 50-fold lower for these tumor cell types than for any other tumor cell line or non-tumorigenic cells. The tumor-selective compounds caused a more preferential suppression of protein synthesis than DNA or RNA synthesis and the prototype compound 3 resulted in an accumulation of prostate cancer cells in the G1 phase of their cell cycle. Compound 3 was also shown to induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. The 2-aminothiophene-3-carboxylic acid ester derivatives represent novel candidate cytostatic agents to be further explored for their tumor-selective potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.