Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23732948›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2013

A 7T fMRI study of cerebellar activation in sequential finger movement tasks.

M R Stefanescu, M Thürling, S Maderwald, T Wiestler, M E Ladd, J Diedrichsen, D Timmann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The multisensory control of sequential actions.Experimental brain research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How the motor system integrates with working memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei are concomitantly activated during eyeblink conditioning: a 7T fMRI study in humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M R StefanescuDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. stefanescu.m.roxana@gmail.com
M Thürling
S Maderwald
T Wiestler
M E Ladd
J Diedrichsen
D Timmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether higher activation of the cerebellar cortex in unpredictable compared to predictable sequential finger movements reflects higher demands in motor response selection or also increases in demands on motor sequencing. Furthermore, we asked the question whether the cerebellar nuclei show a similar or reversed response profile as the cerebellar cortex. Ultra-high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in nineteen right-handed, healthy young participants. Tasks involved finger tapping of a constant sequence, a random sequence, and with one finger at a time (no sequence). Conditions involved the same number of movements of fingers II-V. The three tasks were accompanied by the activation of the known hand areas within the cerebellar cortex and dentate nuclei. Activation of the cerebellar cortex and the dorsorostral dentate was significantly increased in the random-sequence condition compared to both the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions, with no significant difference between the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions. Error rate and movement frequency was not significantly different between conditions. Thus, differences between conditions cannot be explained by differences in motor execution. Because no difference was observed between the no-sequence and the constant-sequence conditions, increased cerebellar activation in the random-sequence condition likely reflects increased demands in motor response selection. Co-activation of cerebellar cortex and nuclei may be a consequence of excitatory afferent collaterals to the nuclei, "rebound-firing" of dentate neurons, and/or inhibitory synaptic input from Purkinje cells.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiCerebellumFemaleFingersHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.