Trial reportExperimental brain research2013
A 7T fMRI study of cerebellar activation in sequential finger movement tasks.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain activity related to individuated finger movement demonstrated by simultaneous motion capture and fMRI.PloS one · 2026Article
- The multisensory control of sequential actions.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Resection of cerebellar tumours causes widespread and functionally relevant white matter impairments.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Convergent and Distinct Effects of Multisensory Combination on Statistical Learning Using a Computer Glove.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- How the motor system integrates with working memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Review
- A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study of patients with Polar Type II/III complex shoulder instability.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Improved detection of fMRI activation in the cerebellum at 7T with dielectric pads extending the imaging region of a commercial head coil.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Article
- Visualizing the Human Subcortex Using Ultra-high Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Brain topography · 2018Review
- Coding complexity in the human motor circuit.Human brain mapping · 2015Article
- Structural and functional MRI abnormalities of cerebellar cortex and nuclei in SCA3, SCA6 and Friedreich's ataxia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2015Article
- Cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei are concomitantly activated during eyeblink conditioning: a 7T fMRI study in humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- The role of cerebellar circuitry alterations in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
- Motor fMRI and cortical grey matter volume in adults born very preterm.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2014Article
- Cerebellar inhibitory output shapes the temporal dynamics of its somatosensory inferior olivary input.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether higher activation of the cerebellar cortex in unpredictable compared to predictable sequential finger movements reflects higher demands in motor response selection or also increases in demands on motor sequencing. Furthermore, we asked the question whether the cerebellar nuclei show a similar or reversed response profile as the cerebellar cortex. Ultra-high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in nineteen right-handed, healthy young participants. Tasks involved finger tapping of a constant sequence, a random sequence, and with one finger at a time (no sequence). Conditions involved the same number of movements of fingers II-V. The three tasks were accompanied by the activation of the known hand areas within the cerebellar cortex and dentate nuclei. Activation of the cerebellar cortex and the dorsorostral dentate was significantly increased in the random-sequence condition compared to both the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions, with no significant difference between the constant-sequence and the no-sequence conditions. Error rate and movement frequency was not significantly different between conditions. Thus, differences between conditions cannot be explained by differences in motor execution. Because no difference was observed between the no-sequence and the constant-sequence conditions, increased cerebellar activation in the random-sequence condition likely reflects increased demands in motor response selection. Co-activation of cerebellar cortex and nuclei may be a consequence of excitatory afferent collaterals to the nuclei, "rebound-firing" of dentate neurons, and/or inhibitory synaptic input from Purkinje cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23732948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.