Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23732903›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Efficacy and safety of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Japan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.

Satoshi Iwata, Shuji Nakata, Susumu Ukae, Yoshitugu Koizumi, Yasuyuki Morita, Haruo Kuroki, Yoshiyuki Tanaka, Toshiyuki Shizuya, Florian Schödel, Michelle L Brown and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00718237 (A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of V260 in Healthy Infants in Japan), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00718237 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of V260 in Healthy Infants in Japan

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2008 to 2009Enrolled762ConditionsRotavirus, GastroenteritisArmsRotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral, Pentavalent (V260, RotaTeq™), Comparator: Comparator: Placebo (unspecified)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Satoshi IwataCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control; Keio University School of Medicine; Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji Nakata
Susumu Ukae
Yoshitugu Koizumi
Yasuyuki Morita
Haruo Kuroki
Yoshiyuki Tanaka
Toshiyuki Shizuya
Florian Schödel
Michelle L Brown
Jody Lawrence

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe gastroenteritis in children under 5 y of age. Estimates of disease burden in Japan suggest that between 26,500 and 78,000 children in this age group need hospitalization each year, resulting in a direct medical cost of 10 to 24 billion Yen. Since being introduced in routine infant immunization schedules in the United States in 2006, the oral live pentavalent rotavirus vaccine RV5 (RotaTeq™) has contributed to dramatic reductions in the incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) and in health care resource utilization. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 3-dose regimen of RV5 in healthy infants, age 6 to 12 weeks, at 32 sites across Japan. The results indicate that RV5 was significantly efficacious in preventing any severity [74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.9%, 90.6%; p<0.001)], moderate-to-severe [80.2% (95% CI: 47.4%, 94.1%)], and severe [100% (95% CI: 55.4%, 100%)] RVGE caused by viruses with serotypes contained in the vaccine. The observed cases of RVGE included rotavirus types G1 (n=19), G3 (n=9), G9 (n=5) and one unspecified G serotype with P1A[8]. No G2 or G4 RVGE cases were observed, and this study was not powered to evaluate efficacy against individual serotypes. RV5 was generally safe and well tolerated in Japanese infants. These results are comparable to those observed in clinical studies conducted in other developed countries. Introduction of the vaccine in Japan may reduce disease burden and associated health care costs.

Indexed as

Double-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGastroenteritisHumansIncidenceInfantJapanMalePlacebosRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesSeverity of Illness IndexVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedPlacebosRotaTeqRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, Attenuatedpentavalent rotavirus vaccinerotavirus gastroenteritisRV5RVGEvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23732903
PMCPMC3906258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.