Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23732474›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2013

Replicative DNA polymerases.

Erik Johansson, Nicholas Dixon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The proofreading mechanism of the human leading-strand DNA polymerase ε holoenzyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Precision Medicine: Recent Innovations in Gene Editing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Non-lytic spread of poliovirus requires the nonstructural protein 3CD.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik JohanssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden. erik.johnsson@medchem.umu.se
Nicholas Dixon
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1959, Arthur Kornberg was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on the principles by which DNA is duplicated by DNA polymerases. Since then, it has been confirmed in all branches of life that replicative DNA polymerases require a single-stranded template to build a complementary strand, but they cannot start a new DNA strand de novo. Thus, they also depend on a primase, which generally assembles a short RNA primer to provide a 3'-OH that can be extended by the replicative DNA polymerase. The general principles that (1) a helicase unwinds the double-stranded DNA, (2) single-stranded DNA-binding proteins stabilize the single-stranded DNA, (3) a primase builds a short RNA primer, and (4) a clamp loader loads a clamp to (5) facilitate the loading and processivity of the replicative polymerase, are well conserved among all species. Replication of the genome is remarkably robust and is performed with high fidelity even in extreme environments. Work over the last decade or so has confirmed (6) that a common two-metal ion-promoted mechanism exists for the nucleotidyltransferase reaction that builds DNA strands, and (7) that the replicative DNA polymerases always act as a key component of larger multiprotein assemblies, termed replisomes. Furthermore (8), the integrity of replisomes is maintained by multiple protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, many of which are inherently weak. This enables large conformational changes to occur without dissociation of replisome components, and also means that in general replisomes cannot be isolated intact.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular ConformationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA PrimaseDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedSpecies SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA PrimaseDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID23732474
PMCPMC3660833
OpenAlexW2109952859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.