ArticleBMC family practice2013
Nationwide continuous monitoring of end-of-life care via representative networks of general practitioners in Europe.
Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Towards a novel framework for identifying commonalities and differences in older people's end-of-life trajectories: aims and interdisciplinary mixed-methods approach of the ERC-funded TRAJECT project.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Initial risk perception and feeling of preparedness of primary care physicians regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium, France and Spain in February 2020.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Provision of end-of-life care in primary care: a survey of issues and outcomes in the Australian context.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Primary palliative care for older people in three European countries: a mortality follow-back quality study.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2020Article
- Article
- Crash course in EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems): 8 years of successes and failures in patient data sharing to learn from.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2018Article
- Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study.Palliative medicine · 2018Article
- Quality of primary palliative care for older people with mild and severe dementia: an international mortality follow-back study using quality indicators.Age and ageing · 2018Article
- Home care by general practitioners for cancer patients in the last 3 months of life: An epidemiological study of quality and associated factors.Palliative medicine · 2016Article
- Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Article
- Care provided and care setting transitions in the last three months of life of cancer patients: a nationwide monitoring study in four European countries.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Burden on family carers and care-related financial strain at the end of life: a cross-national population-based study.European journal of public health · 2014Article
- The European Cancer Patient's Bill of Rights: action steps for success.The oncologist · 2014Article
- Hospitalizations of cancer patients in the last month of life: quality indicator scores reveal large variation between four European countries in a mortality follow-back study.BMC palliative care · 2014Article
- Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough end-of-life care has become an issue of great clinical and public health concern in Europe and beyond, we lack population-based nationwide data that monitor and compare the circumstances of dying and care received in the final months of life in different countries. The European Sentinel GP Networks Monitoring End of Life Care (EURO SENTIMELC) study was designed to describe and compare the last months of life of patients dying in different European countries. We aim to describe how representative GP networks in the EURO SENTIMELC study operate to monitor end of life care in a country, to describe used methodology, research procedures, representativity and characteristics of the population reached using this methodology.
methodsNationwide representative Networks of General Practitioners (GPs)--ie epidemiological surveillance systems representative of all GPs in a country or large region of a country--in Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy and Spain continuously registered every deceased patient (>18 year) in their practice, using weekly standardized registration forms, during two consecutive years (2009-2010).
resultsA total of 6858 deaths were registered of which two thirds died non-suddenly (from 62% in The Netherlands to 69% in Spain), representative for the GP populations in the participating countries. Of all non-sudden deaths, between 32% and 44% of deaths were aged 85 or older; between 46% and 54% were female, and between 23% and 49% died at home. Cancer was cause of death in 37% to 53% of non-sudden death cases in the four participating countries.
conclusionVia the EURO SENTI-MELC methodology, we can build a descriptive epidemiological database on end-of-life care provision in several EU countries, measuring across setting and diseases. The data can serve as baseline measurement to compare and monitor end-of-life care over time. The use of representative GP networks for end-of-life care monitoring has huge potential in Europe where several of these networks are operational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.