Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23731649›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2013

Subpopulation-specific confidence designation for more informative biomedical classification.

Chuanlei Zhang, Ralph L Kodell

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chuanlei ZhangDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Philander Smith College, 900 W. Daisy L. Gatson Bates Dr., Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Ralph L Kodell

Funding

Individualizing cancer predictions via selective voting in convex-hull ensemblesR01CA152667 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI KODELL, RALPH L · 2010 to 2012
$885k
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA152667-03NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough classification algorithms are promising tools to support clinical diagnosis and treatment of disease, the usual implicit assumption underlying these algorithms, that all patients are homogeneous with respect to characteristics of interest, is unsatisfactory. The objective here is to exploit the population heterogeneity reflected by characteristics that may not be apparent and thus not controlled, in order to differentiate levels of classification accuracy between subpopulations and further the goal of tailoring therapies on an individual basis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A new subpopulation-based confidence approach is developed in the context of a selective voting algorithm defined by an ensemble of convex-hull classifiers. Populations of training samples are divided into three subpopulations that are internally homogeneous, with different levels of predictivity. Two different distance measures are used to cluster training samples into subpopulations and assign test samples to these subpopulations.

resultsValidation of the new approach's levels of confidence of classification is carried out using six publicly available datasets. Our approach demonstrates a positive correspondence between the predictivity designations derived from training samples and the classification accuracy of test samples. The average difference between highest- and lowest-confidence accuracies for the six datasets is 17.8%, with a minimum of 11.3% and a maximum of 24.1%.

conclusionThe classification accuracy increases as the designated confidence increases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticArtificial IntelligenceCluster AnalysisData MiningDecision Support TechniquesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnosis, DifferentialGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansPattern Recognition, AutomatedPhenotypeCross-validationGenomic predictionIndividualized therapyPopulation heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID23731649
PMCPMC3727244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.