Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23731388›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

A novel assay to measure B cell responses to keyhole limpet haemocyanin vaccination in healthy volunteers and subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus.

John Ferbas, Shelley S Belouski, Michelle Horner, Arunan Kaliyaperumal, Li Chen, Malcolm Boyce, C Bernie Colaço, Neil McHugh, Vanessa Quick, Richard J Nicholl and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of oral administration of single strainFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biological therapies: a long way on from Jenner.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  11. Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John FerbasDepartment of Medical Sciences, Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA. jferbas@amgen.com
Shelley S Belouski
Michelle Horner
Arunan Kaliyaperumal
Li Chen
Malcolm Boyce
C Bernie Colaço
Neil McHugh
Vanessa Quick
Richard J Nicholl
Gerald Siu
James Chung
Amgen (United States) · USHammersmith Medicines Research · GBRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to characterize performance of a complementary set of assays to measure antigen-specific immune responses in subjects immunized with a neoantigen. Healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 8) and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 6) were immunized with keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) on days 1 and 29. Serum antibodies were detected using a flow cytometric bead array (CBA) that multiplexed the KLH response alongside pre-existing anti-tetanus antibodies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were studied by B cell ELISPOT. These assays were built upon precedent assay development in cynomolgus monkeys, which pointed towards their utility in humans. Primary anti-KLH IgG responses rose to a mean of 65-93-fold above baseline for HV and SLE patients, respectively, and secondary responses rose to a mean of 260-170-fold above baseline. High levels of anti-tetanus IgG were detected in pre-immunization samples and their levels did not change over the course of study. Anti-KLH IgG1-4 subclasses were characterized by a predominant IgG1 response, with no significant differences in subclass magnitude or distribution between HV and SLE subjects. Anti-KLH IgM levels were detectable, although the overall response was lower. IgM was not detected in two SLE subjects whodid generate an IgG response. All subjects responded to KLH by B cell ELISPOT, with no significant differences observed between HV and SLE subjects. The CBA and B cell ELISPOT assays reliably measured anti-KLH B cell responses, supporting use of this approach and these assays to assess the pharmacodynamic and potential safety impact of marketed/investigational immune-therapeutics.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicB-LymphocytesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHemocyaninsHumansImmunoglobulin GLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAdjuvants, ImmunologicHemocyaninsImmunoglobulin Gkeyhole-limpet hemocyaninELISPOT immunoassayflow cytometric bead immunoassaykeyhole limpet haemocyaninsystemic lupus erythematosusvaccine response

Identifiers

PMID23731388
PMCPMC3731594
OpenAlexW2125455002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.