ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2013
Toward an international initiative for traumatic brain injury research.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Is dementia more likely following traumatic brain injury? A systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2023Pooled it
- The ethical and legal landscape of brain data governance.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- A New Approach to Evidence Synthesis in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Pooled it
- Toward a global and reproducible science for brain imaging in neurotrauma: the ENIGMA adult moderate/severe traumatic brain injury working group.Brain imaging and behavior · 2021Pooled it
- Outcome prediction after mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury: external validation of existing models and identification of new predictors using the TRACK-TBI pilot study.Journal of neurotrauma · 2015Trial
- Revolutionizing cross professional collaboration outcomes in TBI: emerging trends in diagnostics, personalized medicine, technological innovations and neurorehabilitation.Brain informatics · 2025Review
- Elevated serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of the synaptophysin and neurogranin with its altered brain expression in the early phase of traumatic brain injury as a potential marker of synaptic injury.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Practical pearls for management of cranial injury in the developing world.Neurosurgical review · 2024Review
- Article
- Post-mortem detection of neuronal and astroglial biochemical markers in serum and urine for diagnostics of traumatic brain injury.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- A minimum data set for traumatic brain injuries in Iran.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Review
- Opportunities and Challenges in High-Quality Contemporary Data Collection in Traumatic Brain Injury: The CENTER-TBI Experience.Neurocritical care · 2022Review
- Proceedings of the Second Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Article
- Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: Data Standards and Statistical Considerations.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Review
- Prognostic Research in Traumatic Brain Injury: Markers, Modeling, and Methodological Principles.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Review
- Assessing the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury-Time for a Change?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- PEERS - An Open Science "Platform for the Exchange of Experimental Research Standards" in Biomedicine.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Neurofilament light as a biomarker in traumatic brain injury.Neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Commission (EC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) jointly sponsored a workshop on October 18-20, 2011 in Brussels to discuss the feasibility and benefits of an international collaboration in the field of traumatic brain injury (TBI) research. The workshop brought together scientists, clinicians, patients, and industry representatives from around the globe as well as funding agencies from the EU, Spain, the United States, and Canada. Sessions tackled both the possible goals and governance of a future initiative and the scientific questions that would most benefit from an integrated international effort: how to optimize data collection and sharing; injury classification; outcome measures; clinical study design; and statistical analysis. There was a clear consensus that increased dialogue and coordination of research at an international level would be beneficial for advancing TBI research, treatment, and care. To this end, the EC, the NIH, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research expressed interest in developing a framework for an international initiative for TBI Research (InTBIR). The workshop participants recommended that InTBIR initially focus on collecting, standardizing, and sharing clinical TBI data for comparative effectiveness research, which will ultimately result in better management and treatments for TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.