ArticleJournal of proteome research2013
Use of theoretical peptide distributions in phosphoproteome analysis.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high mass accuracy and resolution of modern mass spectrometers provides new opportunities to employ theoretical peptide distributions in large-scale proteomic studies. We used theoretical distributions to study noise filtering and mass measurement errors and to examine mass-based differentiation of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptides. Only the monoisotopic mass of the experimental precursor ion was necessary for this analysis. We found that peak deviations can be used to characterize the modification states of peptides in a sample. When applied to large-scale proteomic data sets, the peak deviation distribution can be used to filter chemical/electronic noise for singly charged species. Using peak deviation distributions, it is possible to separate the phosphorylated peptides from the nonphosphorylated peptides, enabling evaluation of the phosphoproteome content of a sample. Because this approach is simple, with light computational requirements, the analysis of theoretical peptide distributions has a significant potential for application to phosphoproteome analyses. For our studies we used publicly available data sets from three large-scale proteomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.