Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23730594›Full record

ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2013

Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis and its relationship to actual breast weight.

Anna Yoo, Kyung Won Minn, Ung Sik Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Assessment of Breast Volume: Can 3D Imaging Be the Gold Standard?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Digital breast volume estimation (DBVE)-A new technique.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Contralateral breast volume measurement during chest CT for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna YooDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Won Minn
Ung Sik Jin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative volume assessment is useful in breast reconstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography are commonly available to reconstructive surgeons in the care of a patient with breast cancer. This study aimed to verify the accuracy of breast volume measured by MRI, and to identify any factor affecting the relationship between measured breast volume and actual breast weight to derive a new model for accurate breast volume estimation.

methodsFrom January 2012 to January 2013, a retrospective review was performed on a total of 101 breasts from 99 patients who had undergone total mastectomy. The mastectomy specimen weight was obtained for each breast. Mammographic and MRI data were used to estimate the volume and density. A standard statistical analysis was performed.

resultsThe mean mastectomy specimen weight was 340.8 g (range, 95 to 795 g). The mean MRI-estimated volume was 322.2 mL(3). When divided into three groups by the "difference percentage value", the underestimated group showed a significantly higher fibroglandular volume, higher percent density, and included significantly more Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System mammographic density grade 4 breasts than the other groups. We derived a new model considering both fibroglandular tissue volume and fat tissue volume for accurate breast volume estimation.

conclusionsMRI-based breast volume assessment showed a significant correlation with actual breast weight; however, in the case of dense breasts, the reconstructive surgeon should note that the mastectomy specimen weight tends to overestimate the volume. We suggested a new model for accurate breast volume assessment considering fibroglandular and fat tissue volume.

Indexed as

Dimensional measurement accuracyMagnetic resonance imagingMammoplasty

Identifiers

PMID23730594
PMCPMC3665862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.