ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2013
Voriconazole and its clinical potential in the prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies: a perspective review.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive fungal infections in hematologic malignancies: Incidence, management, and antifungal therapy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Voriconazole in the EU: Findings and Lessons Learned from a Healthcare Professional Survey.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019Article
- Strategies for the management of invasive fungal infections due to filamentous fungi in high-risk hemato-oncological patients.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019Article
- Budget impact analysis of CYP2C19-guided voriconazole prophylaxis in AML.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have become high prevalence in patients with hematologic malignancies. Drug-based strategies for IFIs include various approaches such as prophylactic, empiric, preemptive, and directed treatment. Prophylaxis is an attractive strategy in high-risk patients, given the lack of reliable diagnostics and the high mortality rate associated with IFIs. Prophylaxis includes the use of antifungal drugs in all patients at risk. An ideal antifungal compound for prophylaxis should have a potent and broad activity, be available both orally and intravenously, and have a low toxicity profile. Voriconazole fulfills all these criteria. The clinical efficacy of voriconazole against the majority of fungal pathogens makes it potentially very useful for the prevention of IFIs in patients with hematologic malignancies. Voriconazole appears to be very effective for the primary and secondary prevention of IFIs in these patients and recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Randomized controlled trials evaluating voriconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia treated for a variety of hematologic malignancies have been performed, confirming its value as a prophylactic agent. Voriconazole is generally safe and well tolerated; however, its use is also associated with a number of concerns. In most patients with hematologic malignancies there is the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions given that voriconazole is metabolized through the P450 cytochrome system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.