ArticleStatistics in biosciences2013
On Estimation of Allele Frequencies via Next-Generation DNA Resequencing with Barcoding.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Likelihood-based complex trait association testing for arbitrary depth sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized biomedical research in recent years. It is now commonly used to identify rare variants through re-sequencing individual genomes. Due to the cost of NGS, researchers have considered pooling samples as a cost-effective alternative to individual sequencing. In this article, we consider the estimation of allele frequencies of rare variants through the NGS technologies with pooled DNA samples with or without barcodes. We consider three methods for estimating allele frequencies from such data, including raw sequencing counts, inferred genotypes, and expected minor allele counts and compare their performance. Our simulation results suggest that the estimator based on inferred genotypes overall performs better than or as well as the other two estimators. When the sequencing coverage is low, biases and MSEs can be sensitive to the choice of the prior probabilities of genotypes for the estimators based on inferred genotypes and expected minor allele counts so that more accurate specification of prior probabilities is critical to lower biases and MSEs. Our study shows that the optimal number of barcodes in a pool is relatively robust to the frequencies of rare variants at a specific coverage depth. We provide general guidelines on using DNA pooling with barcoding for the estimation of allele frequencies of rare variants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.