ArticleDrug discovery today. Technologies2012
Using
Article in Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Gallic Acid on Sleep and Circadian Rhythm in aThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Drosophila CASK regulates brain size and neuronal morphogenesis, providing a genetic model of postnatal microcephaly suitable for drug discovery.Neural development · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Evaluating Learning and Memory in Drosophila melanogaster to Study the Neurodevelopmental Impacts of Toxicants.Current protocols · 2022Article
- Flying Together:International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders 'on the fly': insights fromDisease models & mechanisms · 2019Review
- Prepulse inhibition inBiology open · 2018Article
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models to Enable In Vitro Models for Screening in the Central Nervous System.Stem cells and development · 2015Review
- Increased expression of the PI3K enhancer PIKE mediates deficits in synaptic plasticity and behavior in fragile X syndrome.Cell reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite obvious differences such as the ability to fly, the fruit fly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.