Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23730222›Full record

ArticleClinics in colon and rectal surgery2012

Familial adenomatous polyposis: challenges and pitfalls of surgical treatment.

Satish K Warrier, Matthew F Kalady

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Novel Vaccine Targeting Colonic Adenoma: a Pre-clinical Model.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Surgical aspects of indications and techniques for adenomatous polyposis variants].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. How does genome sequencing impact surgery?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satish K WarrierDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. ; Sanford R. Weiss, M.D. Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Matthew F Kalady
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is complex and requires both sound judgment and technical skills. Because colorectal cancer risk approaches 100%, prophylactic colorectal surgery remains a cornerstone of management. Both patient factors and disease characteristics influence surgical decision-making regarding the timing of prophylactic surgery, the extent of resection, and types of reconstruction. Making appropriate choices can be challenging and there is continued debate regarding optimal strategies. This chapter reviews the controversies in colorectal surgery for FAP.

Indexed as

colorectal surgeryfamilial adenomatous polyposistotal proctocolectomy

Identifiers

PMID23730222
PMCPMC3423882
OpenAlexW2020595208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.