ArticleJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics2013
Estimating Velocity for Processive Motor Proteins with Random Detachment.
Article in Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of detachment of motor protein from track on its transport.Journal of biological physics · 2022Article
- Effective behavior of cooperative and nonidentical molecular motors.Research in the mathematical sciences · 2020Article
- Challenges in Estimating the Motility Parameters of Single Processive Motor Proteins.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Interrogating Emergent Transport Properties for Molecular Motor Ensembles: A Semi-analytical Approach.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We show that, for a wide range of models, the empirical velocity of processive motor proteins has a limiting Pearson type VII distribution with finite mean but infinite variance. We develop maximum likelihood inference for this Pearson type VII distribution. In two simulation studies, we compare the performance of our MLE with the performance of standard Student's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.