ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2012
Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.
Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review.World journal of surgery · 2014Pooled it
- Advantages of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in common bile duct stones.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2018Trial
- Modern Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Breakthroughs, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2024Review
- Predictors of technical success of percutaneous transhepatic common bile duct stone removal: is it only a matter of stone size?European radiology · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is preferred for selected elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2023Article
- Surgical application of an implantable biliary access device in the treatment of refractory recurrent cholangiolithiasis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Normal preoperative levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase predict the absence of common bile duct stones in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Association of Laparoscopic Methods and Clinical Outcomes of Cholecystolithiasis Plus Choledocholithiasis: A Cohort Study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Multimodal treatments of "gallstone cholangiopancreatitis".World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- The Diagnostic Value of GGT-Based Biochemical Indicators for Choledocholithiasis with Negative Imaging Results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Surgical strategy for recurrent common bile duct stones: a 10-year experience of a single center.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019Article
- Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Risk factors and predictors of severity.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Article
- Role of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no consensus regarding the ideal management of concurrent gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones. Currently the treatment protocol involves most commonly a sequential approach consisting of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy or a single stage laparoscopic procedure, including cholecystectomy and exploration of the CBD. For this article literature search was performed using online search engines, Google, Pubmed, the online Springer link library and the Cochrane Database Systematic Review. Review articles, prospective and retrospective studies which detailed or compared the various treatment strategies for CBD stones were selected and analyzed. This review article aims to provide an insight into the optimal management of CBD stones in different clinical scenarios. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has inherent morbidity and complications like CBD stone recurrence whereas laparoscopic CBD exploration demands considerable expertise which is available only at specialized centres. The clinical presentation of the patient, number of stones, size of CBD, available resources and technical expertise at hand are an important consideration for the ideal management in different scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.