Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23730050›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2012

Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?

Brij B Agarwal, Chintamani, Kamran Ali, Karan Goyal, Krishan C Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Practice of Surgery-Decision, Precision, Incision.The Indian journal of surgery · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cashless, Tech-Savvy Future Surgeon.The Indian journal of surgery · 2016
    Article
  8. Fast Track Surgery-Minimizing Side Effects of Surgery.The Indian journal of surgery · 2015
    Article
  9. Esophagectomy: anastomotic leak, stent the rent!Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brij B AgarwalDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060 India ; Dr. Agarwal's Surgery & Yoga, F-81&F-82, Street 4, Virender Nagar, Janakpuri, New Delhi, India.
Chintamani
Kamran Ali
Karan Goyal
Krishan C Mahajan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in surgical practice has paralleled the civilizational evolution. Surgery has progressed from being the last resort in saving life to being form and function preserver. Post-renaissance Industrial age gave an impetus to this march of surgery. The currently on going digital technological revolution has further catalysed this march. Having achieved the stabilized and acceptable clinical outcomes, the surgeon has embarked on a journey of improving patient reported outcomes (PRO). Improvement in PROs with the advent of laparoscopic surgery with the attendant emphasis on minimising invasion has led to debates about invasion being just parietal or holistic in physiological sense. There is a concern that parietal invasiveness shouldn't be a trade-off for compromised clinical outcomes. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in its current avatar with current instrumentation seems to be an enthusiastic bandwagon rolling on with the cosmetic benefits acting as veil to hide the potential clinical concerns. History of surgical innovations is riddled with tales of vindictiveness and vicissitude. Lest the same fate befalls SILS we would do better to examine the SILS bandwagon in its current form till the emerging technologies address the current concerns.

Indexed as

History of innovationsInformed consentInnovations in surgeryMetric of innovationPatient reported outcomesReduced port surgerySingle incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS)

Identifiers

PMID23730050
PMCPMC3397188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.