ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2012
Site-specific variance in radius and tibia bone strength as determined by muscle size and body mass.
Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peak power and body mass as predictors of tibial bone strength in healthy male and female adults.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022Article
- Associations Between Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Power, and Skeletal Size, Density and Strength in Older Men.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018Article
- Proximal tibial trabecular bone mineral density is related to pain in patients with osteoarthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2017Article
- Ethical framework of assistive devices: review and reflection.Robotics and biomimetics · 2017Review
- Patella bone density is lower in knee osteoarthritis patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain at rest.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2016Article
- Lower-extremity muscle atrophy and fat infiltration after chronic spinal cord injury.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the predictive ability of muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and body mass on bone mineral content, compressive bone strength index (BSIc), and the polar stress-strain index (SSIp) of the forearms and lower legs of middle-aged adults.
methodsA total of 53 healthy adults (37 male, 16 female; mean age 50.4; SD 2.1 y) were scanned with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to measure radius and tibia total and cortical bone mineral content, BSIc, SSIp, and forearm and lower-leg MCSA (BSIc: 4% distal; SSIp and MCSA at 65% and 66% radius and tibia shaft sites, respectively). Multiple regression models adjusted for sex and height were used to assess the relative variance in radius or tibia bone outcomes predicted by body mass and/or forearm or lower-leg MCSA.
resultsForearm MCSA independently predicted total bone-mineral content, BSIc, and SSIp in radius (r partial=0.59, 0.56, 0.42). Body mass was a negative predictor of radius BSIc (r partial=-0.32) and did not predict other radius outcomes when both body mass and MCSA were forced in the models. In the lower leg shaft, MCSA, and body mass predicted bone content and strength similarly when independently added to the models with sex and height.
conclusionsForearm MCSA was a dominant predictor of radius bone content and estimated strength. In the tibia, both body mass and lower-leg MCSA contributed to predicting bone content and estimated strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.