ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2012
Incidence of staphylococci and streptococci during winter in mastitic milk of sahiwal cow and murrah buffaloes.
Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant bovine mastitis bacteria in Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- Article
- Understanding the genomic architecture of clinical mastitis in3 Biotech · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mastitis is a serious problem in dairy sector and among various aetiological agents, the incidence of staphylococci and streptococci remains high in milking animal. The present study was focused on detection of staphylococci and streptococci in winter season. Milk samples (117) of mastitic animals were tested for presence of staphylococci and streptococci using biochemical and PCR based assays. The testing revealed majority of animals (90.6%) were infected with more than one causative agent. Amongst 117 sample, 109 and 90 comprised of staphylococci and 90 streptococci, respectively. Distribution proportion of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. agalactiae, S. uberis and S. dysgalactiae among the mastitic cases was found as 64.9, 7.7, 5.1, 1.7, 48.7, 65.8 and 0.8%, respectively. Streptococci and staphylococci were observed in different combinations and the frequent were S. aureus/S. agalactiae/S. uberis, S. aureus/S. uberis, S. aureus/S. agalactiae and S. agalactiae/S. uberis which were accounted for 23.9, 19.7, 5.9 and 2.6%, respectively. Approximately half of the (52.1%) cases were observed for reoccurrence of mastitis. Reoccurrence of mastitis in winter season among these cases was significantly low as compared to summer (cattle-5 cases; buffaloes-2 cases). In addition, prevalence of S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. uberis, and S. epidermidis in reoccurring mastitic cases was 73.7, 63.9, 45.9 and 6.6%, respectively. The observations revealed mastitis causing pathogens remains in hidden phase in winter season; however, cannot be neglected. The observation might be helpful in culling or segregation of cows for mastitis reduction programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.