ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2013
A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of BioCoat™ and Fissurit FX: a randomized 18-month split-mouth study.Odontology · 2026Trial
- Short-term clinical success of posterior amalgam and composite restorations in public dental care: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Longevity of Amalgam Versus Composite Resin Restorations in Permanent Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Multifactorial Contributors to the Longevity of Dental Restorations: An Integrated Review of Related Factors.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Determining the Failure Rate of Direct Restorations-Chart Review versus Electronic Health Record Reports.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Longevity of composite restorations in posterior teeth placed by dental students: a 12-year retrospective study.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Factors influencing the longevity of posterior composite restorations: A dental university clinic study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in an Iranian Population : Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Study on the Restoration of Class II Carious Cavities by Virtual Methods: Simulation of Mechanical Behavior.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations-A Retrospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Influence of Practitioner-Related Placement Variables on the Compressive Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins-An In Vitro Clinical Simulation Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Observational
- A Contemporary Evaluation on Posterior Direct Restoration Teaching among Undergraduates in Dental Schools in Malaysia.Dentistry journal · 2021Article
- Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
- Article
- Value of root-filled teeth in maintaining a functional dentition for life.British dental journal · 2019Article
- Judgment of the Quality of Restorative Care as Predictors of Restoration Retreatment: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.JDR clinical and translational research · 2017Article
- Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2016Article
- Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2015Article
- The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN.Journal of dentistry · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byRubber dam.2013
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowing which factors influence restoration longevity can help clinicians make sound treatment decisions. The authors analyzed data from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to identify predictors of early failures of amalgam and resin-based composite (RBC) restorations.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, the authors gathered information from clinicians and offices participating in the network. Clinicians completed a baseline data collection form at the time of restoration placement and annually thereafter. Data collected included patient factors, practice factors and dentist factors, and the authors analyzed them by using mixed-model logistic regression.
resultsA total of 226 practitioners followed up 6,218 direct restorations in 3,855 patients; 386 restorations failed (6.2 percent) during the mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 23.7 (8.8) months. The number of tooth surfaces restored at baseline helped predict subsequent restoration failure; restorations with four or more restored surfaces were more than four times more likely to fail. Restorative material was not associated significantly with longevity; neither was tooth type. Older patient age was associated highly with failure (P < .001). The failure rate for children was 4 percent, compared with 10 percent for people 65 years or older. Dentist's sex and practice workload were associated significantly with restoration longevity.
conclusionsIn this prospective cohort study, these factors were significantly predictive of failure for amalgam and RBC restorations: patient's age, a higher number of surfaces restored at baseline, the dentist's sex and the practice workload. Material choice was not significantly predictive in these early results. Practical Implications. If clinicians can recognize and identify the risk factors associated with early restoration failure, more effective treatment plans may be offered to the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.