Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728866›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2013

The airport atmospheric environment: respiratory health at work.

Léa Touri, Hélène Marchetti, Irène Sari-Minodier, Nicolas Molinari, Pascal Chanez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Léa TouriAix-Marseille Université, Faculté de médecine de la Timone, Service de santé au travail, Marseille, France.
Hélène Marchetti
Irène Sari-Minodier
Nicolas Molinari
Pascal Chanez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air traffic is increasing, raising concern about local pollution and its adverse health effects on the people living in the vicinity of large airports. However, the highest risk is probably occupational exposure due to proximity. Jet exhaust is one of the main concerns at an airport and may have a health impact, particularly on the respiratory tract. Current studies are neither numerous enough nor strong enough to prove this kind of association. Yet, more and more people work in airports, and occupational exposure to jet exhaust is a fact. The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing knowledge regarding the impact of airport pollution on respiratory health. We conducted systematic literature searches to examine workplace exposures.

Indexed as

AircraftAirportsVehicle EmissionsWorkplaceAir Pollutants, OccupationalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansInhalation ExposureOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthRespiratory Tract DiseasesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAir Pollutants, OccupationalVehicle EmissionsAirportair trafficjet exhaustoccupational exposurerespiratory problemsrespiratory tract

Identifiers

PMID23728866
PMCPMC9487387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.