Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728795›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Substrate ambiguous enzymes within the Escherichia coli proteome offer different evolutionary solutions to the same problem.

Sylvia Hsu-Chen Yip, Ichiro Matsumura

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rescue ofeLife · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ACS synthetic biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolutionary repurposing of a sulfatase: A new Michaelis complex leads to efficient transition state charge offset.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A protein constructed de novo enables cell growth by altering gene regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Evolution of new functions de novo and from preexisting genes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  16. An evolutionary biochemist's perspective on promiscuity.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvia Hsu-Chen YipDepartment of Biochemistry, Center for Fundamental and Applied Molecular Evolution, Rollins Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, USA.
Ichiro Matsumura
Emory University · US

Funding

Catalytically Promiscuous Enzymes As Evolutionary Starting PointsR01GM086824 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MATSUMURA, ICHIRO · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM086824NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many enzymes exhibit some catalytic promiscuity or substrate ambiguity. These weak activities do not affect the fitness of the organism under ordinary circumstances, but can serve as potential evolutionary precursors of new catalytic functions. We wondered whether different proteins with the same substrate ambiguous activity evolve differently under identical selection conditions. Patrick et al. (Patrick WM, Quandt EM, Swartzlander DB, Matsumura I. 2007. Multicopy suppression underpins metabolic evolvability. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2716-2722.) previously showed that three multicopy suppressors, gph, hisB, and ytjC, rescue ΔserB Escherichia coli cells from starvation on minimal media. We directed the evolution of variants of Gph, histidinol phosphatase (HisB), and YtjC that complemented ΔserB more efficiently, and characterized the effects of the amino acid changes, alone and in combination, upon the evolved phosphoserine phosphatase (PSP) activity. Gph and HisB are members of the HAD superfamily of hydrolases, but they adapted through different, kinetically distinguishable, biochemical mechanisms. All of the selected mutations, except N102T in YtjC, proved to be beneficial in isolation. They exhibited a pattern of antagonistic epistasis, as their effects in combination upon the kinetic parameters of the three proteins in reactions with phosphoserine were nonmultiplicative. The N102T mutation exhibited sign epistasis, as it was deleterious in isolation but beneficial in the context of other mutations. We also showed that the D57N mutation in the chromosomal copy of hisB is sufficient to suppress the ΔserB deletion. These results in combination show that proteomes can offer multiple mechanistic solutions to a molecular recognition problem.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBiocatalysisBiological EvolutionEpistasis, GeneticEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenes, SuppressorGenetic Complementation TestHistidinol-PhosphataseKineticsModels, MolecularMutationPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphoserineProteomeSubstrate SpecificityEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidinol-PhosphatasePhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphoserinephosphoserine phosphataseProteomecatalytic promiscuitydirected evolutionsubstrate ambiguitysubstrate specificity

Identifiers

PMID23728795
PMCPMC3842161
OpenAlexW2118063300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.