Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728695›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Xiongshao for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease.

Guo Hua Zheng, Jian Ping Liu, Jian Feng Chu, Lijuan Mei, Hai Ying Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guo Hua ZhengCenter for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China. zhghchar "A8penalty z@ 1969@yahoo.com.cn
Jian Ping Liu
Jian Feng Chu
Lijuan Mei
Hai Ying Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement is a standard treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). In-stent restenosis after PCI remains an important clinical problem. Xiongshao capsule has been reported to be beneficial in preventing restenosis after PCI in CHD patients. However, the strength of evidence to support its use is unclear.

objectivesTo systematically assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine Xiongshao capsule in preventing restenosis after PCI in patients with CHD. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 of 2012), MEDLINE (OVID) (1948 to week 1 March 2012), EMBASE (OVID) (1980 to week 10 2012), ISI Web of Science with Conference Proceedings (1970 to 14 March 2012), LILACS (1982 to 15 March 2012), Chinese biomedical literature database (1980 to May 2012), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1994 to May 2012), Chinese Medical Current Contents (1994 to May 2012), VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (1989 to May 2012), Chinese Master's Theses Full-Text Database (1994 to May 2012), China Doctor Dissertation Full-Text Database (1994 to May 2012), and China Proceedings of Conference Full-Text Database (1994 to May 2012). We also searched ongoing trials and research registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing Xiongshao capsule alone/plus conventional western medicine with the same conventional western medicine alone/plus placebo in participants with CHD who met the recognised diagnostic criteria and had successfully undergone a PCI procedure were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials using The Cochrane Collaboration tool, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third review author. Data were pooled for meta-analysis using the fixed-effect model, and the results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN

resultsFour trials involving 649 participants were included in this review. Two of these trials (459 participants) were designed as randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with an adequate methodological description; the other two trials (190 participants) described an inadequate methodological design. All four trials with 649 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Significant differences were noted in rates of restenosis, recurrence angina pectoris, and serious cardiovascular adverse events between Xiongshao capsule plus conventional western medicine and the same conventional western medicine alone; RR values (95% CIs) were 0.41 (0.22 to 0.75), 0.47 (0.31 to 0.72), and 0.47 (0.25 to 0.90), respectively. Xiongshao capsule plus conventional western medicine showed more significant reductions in restenosis (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80), recurrence angina pectoris (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38), and serious cardiovascular adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.70) than the same conventional western medicine plus placebo. Safety outcomes and adverse events of the Xiongshao capsule were reported in two trials, which reported no adverse events. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe summary estimates indicate a protective effect of Xiongshao on restenosis and suggest that Xiongshao capsule may be used to prevent restenosis after a PCI procedure in CHD patients. However, this evidence is derived from small randomised trials, all conducted in China, and two of the included trials showed important methodological limitations that undermine the validity of the findings. Additional high-quality research trials with sufficient sample size are required.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAngina PectorisCoronary RestenosisDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceStentsDrugs, Chinese Herbalxiongshao

Identifiers

PMID23728695
PMCPMC11246721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.