SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with a primary brain tumour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Socio-Emotional Values Within Organizations.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatment of depression in people with a primary brain tumour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) in adults with malignant glioma: a proof-of-concept phase IIa trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Trial
- [Rational treatment of depressive syndromes in brain tumor patients].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- A systematic review of pharmacologic treatment efficacy for depression in older patients with cancer.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2022Review
- Blood Inflammatory Cytokines as Predictors of Depression in Patients With Glioma.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Imipramine impedes glioma progression by inhibiting YAP as a Hippo pathway independent manner and synergizes with temozolomide.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Inverse in silico-in vitro fishing of unexpected paroxetine kinase targets from tumor druggable kinome.Journal of molecular modeling · 2020Article
- The Effect of Hypnotics on Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function in Patients with Brain Tumors.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2020Article
- Antiepileptic and psychiatric medication in a nationwide cohort of patients with glioma WHO grade II-IV.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Neurocognitive Deficits and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation in Adult Brain Tumors.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016Review
- Psychiatric aspects of brain tumors: A review.World journal of psychiatry · 2015Review
- Medical management of brain tumors and the sequelae of treatment.Neuro-oncology · 2015Review
- Depression screening in patients with brain tumors: a review.CNS oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 3, 2010.Patients with a primary brain tumour often experience depression, for which drug treatment may be prescribed. However, these patients are also at high risk of epileptic seizures, cognitive impairment and fatigue, all of which are potential side effects of antidepressants. The benefit, or harm, of pharmacological treatment of depression in brain tumour patients is unclear.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with a primary brain tumour. SEARCH
methodsWe updated the search to include the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 10), MEDLINE to October 2012, EMBASE to October 2012 and PsycINFO to October 2012. We searched the British Nursing Index, LILACS, PSYNDEX, the NHS National Research Register, the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination's Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) and Web of Knowledge (covering Science Scisearch, Social Sciences Citation Index and Biological Abstracts) for the original review (to July 2009). In the original review we also handsearched Neuro-oncology, the Journal of Neuro-oncology, the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry and the Journal of Clinical Oncology (July 1999 to June 2009) and wrote to all the pharmaceutical companies manufacturing antidepressants for use in the UK. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, cohort studies and case-control studies of any pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with a histologically diagnosed primary brain tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No studies met the inclusion criteria. MAIN
resultsWe found no eligible studies evaluating the benefits of any pharmacological treatment of depression in brain tumour patients. AUTHORS'
conclusionsNo high-quality studies have examined the value of pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with a primary brain tumour. RCTs and detailed prospective studies are required to inform the effective pharmacological treatment of this common and important complication of brain tumours. Since the last version of this review none of the new relevant studies have provided additional information to change these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.