Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728645›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Oxcarbazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy.

Sarah J Nolan, Martie Muller, Catrin Tudur Smith, Anthony G Marson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah J NolanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Shelley's Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 3GS.
Martie Muller
Catrin Tudur Smith
Anthony G Marson
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Department of Health 10/4001/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2.Worldwide, phenytoin is a commonly used antiepileptic drug. For the newer drugs such as oxcarbazepine, it is important to know how they compare with standard treatments.

objectivesTo review the best evidence comparing oxcarbazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy in participants with partial onset seizures or generalised tonic-clonic seizures with or without other generalised seizure types. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register (22 January 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12) and MEDLINE (1946 to 22 January 2013). We handsearched relevant journals and contacted pharmaceutical companies, original trial investigators and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures with a comparison of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with phenytoin monotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This was an individual participant data review. Outcomes were time to (a) treatment withdrawal (b) 12-month remission (c) six-month remission and (d) first seizure post randomisation. We used Cox proportional hazards models to obtain study-specific estimates of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the generic inverse variance method used to obtain the overall pooled HR and 95% CI. MAIN

resultsIndividual participant data were available for 480 out of 517 participants (93%) from three included trials. For remission outcomes, a HR > 1 indicates an advantage to phenytoin and for first seizure and withdrawal outcomes a HR > 1 indicates an advantage to oxcarbazepine.The main overall results (pooled HR, 95% CI) were: (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment 1.65 (1.08 to 2.52), (ii) time to 12-month remission 0.92 (0.68 to 1.24), (iii) time to six-month remission 0.90 (0.70 to 1.15), (iv) time to first seizure 1.07 (0.83 to 1.39). Results indicate a statistically significant advantage for oxcarbazepine over phenytoin for time to treatment withdrawal, but insufficient evidence to suggest a difference between the drugs for other outcomes. By epilepsy type, there is no significant advantage for either drug for generalised epilepsy, however there is a significant advantage for partial epilepsy with oxcarbazepine for time to treatment withdrawal (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.33). AUTHORS'

conclusionsFor participants with partial onset seizures oxcarbazepine is significantly less likely to be withdrawn, but current data do not allow a statement as to whether oxcarbazepine is equivalent, superior or inferior to phenytoin in terms of seizure control. However, the design of the studies may have biased seizure outcomes and misclassification of epilepsy type may have biased withdrawal rates.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineEpilepsies, PartialEpilepsyHumansInduction ChemotherapyOxcarbazepinePhenytoinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineOxcarbazepinePhenytoin

Identifiers

PMID23728645
OpenAlexW2156420184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.