Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728301›Full record

ArticleNature2013

High-resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells.

James O'Malley, Stavroula Skylaki, Kumiko A Iwabuchi, Eleni Chantzoura, Tyson Ruetz, Anna Johnsson, Simon R Tomlinson, Sten Linnarsson, Keisuke Kaji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Highly efficient reprogrammable mouse lines with integrated reporters to track the route to pluripotency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AP-1 activity is a major barrier of human somatic cell reprogramming.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James O'MalleyMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Stavroula Skylaki
Kumiko A Iwabuchi
Eleni Chantzoura
Tyson Ruetz
Anna Johnsson
Simon R Tomlinson
Sten Linnarsson
Keisuke Kaji

Funding

European Research Council 261075Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells presents a challenge to normal developmental processes. The low efficiency and heterogeneity of most methods have hindered understanding of the precise molecular mechanisms promoting, and roadblocks preventing, efficient reprogramming. Although several intermediate populations have been described, it has proved difficult to characterize the rare, asynchronous transition from these intermediate stages to iPS cells. The rapid expansion of minor reprogrammed cells in the heterogeneous population can also obscure investigation of relevant transition processes. Understanding the biological mechanisms essential for successful iPS cell generation requires both accurate capture of cells undergoing the reprogramming process and identification of the associated global gene expression changes. Here we demonstrate that in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, reprogramming follows an orderly sequence of stage transitions, marked by changes in the cell-surface markers CD44 and ICAM1, and a Nanog-enhanced green fluorescent protein (Nanog-eGFP) reporter. RNA-sequencing analysis of these populations demonstrates two waves of pluripotency gene upregulation, and unexpectedly, transient upregulation of several epidermis-related genes, demonstrating that reprogramming is not simply the reversal of the normal developmental processes. This novel high-resolution analysis enables the construction of a detailed reprogramming route map, and the improved understanding of the reprogramming process will lead to new reprogramming strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCellular ReprogrammingEpidermisFibroblastsFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingGenes, ReporterHyaluronan ReceptorsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1MiceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisUp-RegulationBiomarkersCd44 protein, mouseHyaluronan ReceptorsIcam1 protein, mouseIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID23728301
PMCPMC3743022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.