ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2013
Modeling catalytic promiscuity in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inorganic Polyphosphate and Alkaline Phosphatase/Adenylate Kinase: Key Components of the Physiological ATP-Dependent Wound Repair and Mode of Action.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
- Multifunctionally diverse alkaline phosphatases of Alteromonas drive the phosphorus cycle in the ocean.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Structural insights into choline-O-sulfatase reveal the molecular determinants for ligand binding.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Article
- Inorganic Polyphosphate: Coacervate Formation and Functional Significance in Nanomedical Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- Conformational dynamics and enzyme evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018Review
- Analysis of Phosphoryl-Transfer Enzymes with QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Methods in enzymology · 2018Article
- Simulating the fidelity and the three Mg mechanism of pol η and clarifying the validity of transition state theory in enzyme catalysis.Proteins · 2017Article
- Insights into the Mechanistic Basis of Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance from Crystal Structures of the Catalytic Domain of MCR-1.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Computational tools for the evaluation of laboratory-engineered biocatalysts.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2016Review
- Promiscuity in the Enzymatic Catalysis of Phosphate and Sulfate Transfer.Biochemistry · 2016Review
- The Classification and Evolution of Enzyme Function.Biophysical journal · 2015Review
- The Role of Conformational Dynamics and Allostery in the Disease Development of Human Ferritin.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Cooperative Electrostatic Interactions Drive Functional Evolution in the Alkaline Phosphatase Superfamily.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Resolving apparent conflicts between theoretical and experimental models of phosphate monoester hydrolysis.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Parametrization of DFTB3/3OB for magnesium and zinc for chemical and biological applications.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2015Article
- The evolution of enzyme function in the isomerases.Current opinion in structural biology · 2014Review
- Force field independent metal parameters using a nonbonded dummy model.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
- Parameterization of DFTB3/3OB for Sulfur and Phosphorus for Chemical and Biological Applications.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2014Article
- QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.Molecular simulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that promiscuity plays a key role in the evolution of new enzyme function. This finding has helped to elucidate fundamental aspects of molecular evolution. While there has been extensive experimental work on enzyme promiscuity, computational modeling of the chemical details of such promiscuity has traditionally fallen behind the advances in experimental studies, not least due to the nearly prohibitive computational cost involved in examining multiple substrates with multiple potential mechanisms and binding modes in atomic detail with a reasonable degree of accuracy. However, recent advances in both computational methodologies and power have allowed us to reach a stage in the field where we can start to overcome this problem, and molecular simulations can now provide accurate and efficient descriptions of complex biological systems with substantially less computational cost. This has led to significant advances in our understanding of enzyme function and evolution in a broader sense. Here, we will discuss currently available computational approaches that can allow us to probe the underlying molecular basis for enzyme specificity and selectivity, discussing the inherent strengths and weaknesses of each approach. As a case study, we will discuss recent computational work on different members of the alkaline phosphatase superfamily (AP) using a range of different approaches, showing the complementary insights they have provided. We have selected this particular superfamily, as it poses a number of significant challenges for theory, ranging from the complexity of the actual reaction mechanisms involved to the reliable modeling of the catalytic metal centers, as well as the very large system sizes. We will demonstrate that, through current advances in methodologies, computational tools can provide significant insight into the molecular basis for catalytic promiscuity, and, therefore, in turn, the mechanisms of protein functional evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.