Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23728140›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2013

Dopamine controls the neural dynamics of memory signals and retrieval accuracy.

Thore Apitz, Nico Bunzeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thore ApitzDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nico Bunzeck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is capable of differentiating between new and already stored information rapidly to allow optimal behavior and decision-making. Although the neural mechanisms of novelty discrimination were often described as temporally constant (ie, with specific latencies), recent electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that the onset of neural novelty signals (ie, differences in event-related responses to new and old items) can be accelerated by reward motivation. While the precise physiological mechanisms underlying this acceleration remain unclear, the involvement of the neurotransmitter dopamine in both novelty and reward processing suggests that enhanced dopamine levels in the context of reward prospect may have a role. To investigate this hypothesis, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) in combination with an old/new recognition memory task in which correct discrimination between old and new items was rewarded. Importantly, before the task, human subjects received either 150 mg of the dopamine precursor levodopa or placebo. For the placebo group, old/new signals peaked at ∼100 ms after stimulus onset over left temporal/occipital sensors. In contrast, after levodopa administration earliest old/new effects only emerged after ∼400 ms and retrieval accuracy was reduced as expressed in lower d' values. As such, our results point towards a previously unreported role of dopamine in controlling the chronometry of neural processes underlying the distinction between old and new information. They also suggest that this relationship follows a nonlinear function whereby slightly enhanced dopamine levels accelerate neural/cognitive processes and excessive dopamine levels impair them.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingDopamineFemaleHumansLevodopaMagnetocardiographyMaleMemoryRecognition, PsychologyRewardYoung AdultDopamineLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID23728140
PMCPMC3799060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.