Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23727620›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2013

Understanding reasons for participating in a school-based influenza vaccination program and decision-making dynamics among adolescents and parents.

Natasha L Herbert, Lisa M Gargano, Julia E Painter, Jessica M Sales, Christopher Morfaw, Dennis Murray, Ralph J Diclemente, James M Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Japanese people's perception of risk information for making decisions to receive influenza and rubella vaccinations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natasha L HerbertDepartment of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. nherber@emory.edu
Lisa M Gargano
Julia E Painter
Jessica M Sales
Christopher Morfaw
Dennis Murray
Ralph J Diclemente
James M Hughes

Funding

Training a New Generation of VaccinologistsT32AI074492 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Rama Rao Amara, Benjamin A Lopman · 2009 to 2026
$6.4M
TRAINING IN IMMUNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIST32AI007610 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI EVAVOLD, BRIAN D · 2000 to 2014
$4.4M
Influenza Vaccine Delivery to Adolescents: two multicomponent interventionsR18IP000166 · IP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HUGHES, JAMES M. · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
Factors Associated with Teens' Non-Responsiveness to HIV InterventionK01MH085506 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SALES, JESSICA A · 2009 to 2013
$686k
NCIRD CDC HHS 5 R18 IP000166NIAID NIH HHS 5T32AI074492-02NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007610NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074492NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH085506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Vaccinating school-aged children has been demonstrated to be beneficial to the child and in reducing viral transmission to vulnerable groups such as the elderly. This qualitative study sought to identify reasons parents and students participated in a school-based influenza vaccination clinic and to characterize the decision-making process for vaccination. Eight focus groups were conducted with parents and students. Parents and students who participated in the influenza vaccination clinic stated the educational brochure mailed to their home influenced participation in the program. Parents of non-participating students mentioned barriers, such as the lengthy and complicated consent process and suspicions about the vaccine clinic, as contributing to their decision not to vaccinate their child. Vaccinated students reported initiating influenza vaccine discussion with their parents. Parental attitudes and the educational material influenced parents' decision to allow their child to receive influenza vaccine. This novel study explored reasons for participating in a school-based vaccination clinic and the decision-making process between parents and child(ren). Persons running future school-based vaccination clinics may consider hosting an 'information session with a question and answer session' to address parental concerns and assist with the consent process.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdolescentDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleParent-Child RelationsParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicQualitative ResearchSchool Health ServicesStudentsInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23727620
PMCPMC3708138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.