Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23727024›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2013

Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources.

D B Keator, K Helmer, J Steffener, J A Turner, T G M Van Erp, S Gadde, N Ashish, G A Burns, B N Nichols

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data Provenance in Biomedical Research: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

D B KeatorDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA. dbkeator@uci.edu
K Helmer
J Steffener
J A Turner
T G M Van Erp
S Gadde
N Ashish
G A Burns
B N Nichols
University of California, Irvine · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USColumbia University · USDuke University · USMind Research Network · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

FUNCTION BIRNU24RR021992 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI POTKIN, STEVEN G · 2006 to 2010
$25.0M
University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
BIO-INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTER (BIRN-CC)U24RR025736 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2009 to 2011
$15.0M
IBIC: Integrated Brain Imaging Center for the University of WashingtonRC4NS073008 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRABOWSKI, THOMAS J. · 2010 to 2010
$4.8M
AGE-RELATED STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL NEURAL CHANGES ON COGNITIVE MEASURESK01AG035061 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STEFFENER, JASON RANDALL · 2010 to 2014
$628k
NCRR NIH HHS 1 U24 RR025736-01NCRR NIH HHS 1 U24 U24 RR021992NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021992NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR025736NIA NIH HHS K01 AG035061NINDS NIH HHS RC4 NS073008NINDS NIH HHS RC4 NS073008-01NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sharing efforts increasingly contribute to the acceleration of scientific discovery. Neuroimaging data is accumulating in distributed domain-specific databases and there is currently no integrated access mechanism nor an accepted format for the critically important meta-data that is necessary for making use of the combined, available neuroimaging data. In this manuscript, we present work from the Derived Data Working Group, an open-access group sponsored by the Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) and the International Neuroimaging Coordinating Facility (INCF) focused on practical tools for distributed access to neuroimaging data. The working group develops models and tools facilitating the structured interchange of neuroimaging meta-data and is making progress towards a unified set of tools for such data and meta-data exchange. We report on the key components required for integrated access to raw and derived neuroimaging data as well as associated meta-data and provenance across neuroimaging resources. The components include (1) a structured terminology that provides semantic context to data, (2) a formal data model for neuroimaging with robust tracking of data provenance, (3) a web service-based application programming interface (API) that provides a consistent mechanism to access and query the data model, and (4) a provenance library that can be used for the extraction of provenance data by image analysts and imaging software developers. We believe that the framework and set of tools outlined in this manuscript have great potential for solving many of the issues the neuroimaging community faces when sharing raw and derived neuroimaging data across the various existing database systems for the purpose of accelerating scientific discovery.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansInformaticsInformation DisseminationInternetNeuroimagingDatabaseData modelNeuroimagingProvenanceWeb servicesXCEDE

Identifiers

PMID23727024
PMCPMC4028152
OpenAlexW2963232910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.