Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23726970›Full record

ArticleHearing research2013

Conserved mechanisms of vocalization coding in mammalian and songbird auditory midbrain.

Sarah M N Woolley, Christine V Portfors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalent Harmonic Interaction in the Bat Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?Molecular psychology : brain, behavior, and society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Differential Inhibitory Configurations Segregate Frequency Selectivity in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah M N WoolleyColumbia University, Department of Psychology, 406 Schermerhorn Hall, 1190 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: sw2277@columbia.edu.
Christine V Portfors

Funding

Neural Coding and Perception of Learned VocalizationsR01DC009810 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WOOLLEY, SARAH M · 2010 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009810NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC009810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquity of social vocalizations among animals provides the opportunity to identify conserved mechanisms of auditory processing that subserve communication. Identifying auditory coding properties that are shared across vocal communicators will provide insight into how human auditory processing leads to speech perception. Here, we compare auditory response properties and neural coding of social vocalizations in auditory midbrain neurons of mammalian and avian vocal communicators. The auditory midbrain is a nexus of auditory processing because it receives and integrates information from multiple parallel pathways and provides the ascending auditory input to the thalamus. The auditory midbrain is also the first region in the ascending auditory system where neurons show complex tuning properties that are correlated with the acoustics of social vocalizations. Single unit studies in mice, bats and zebra finches reveal shared principles of auditory coding including tonotopy, excitatory and inhibitory interactions that shape responses to vocal signals, nonlinear response properties that are important for auditory coding of social vocalizations and modulation tuning. Additionally, single neuron responses in the mouse and songbird midbrain are reliable, selective for specific syllables, and rely on spike timing for neural discrimination of distinct vocalizations. We propose that future research on auditory coding of vocalizations in mouse and songbird midbrain neurons adopt similar experimental and analytical approaches so that conserved principles of vocalization coding may be distinguished from those that are specialized for each species. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Communication Sounds and the Brain: New Directions and Perspectives".

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysChiropteraMammalsMesencephalonMicePattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSocial BehaviorSongbirdsSpecies SpecificityA1central nucleus of the inferior colliculusCFcharacteristic frequencydBDCNdecibelsDNLLdorsal cochlear nucleusdorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscusICICcinferior colliculusINLLintermediate nucleus of the lateral lemniscuskHzkilohertzlateral dorsal mesencephalonlateral superior oliveLLDLLILLVLSOmedial geniculate bodymedial superior oliveMGBmillisecondMLdmsMSONANLNMnucleus angularisnucleus laminarisnucleus magnocellularisnucleus ovoidalisOColivocochlear nucleusOvprimary auditory cortexRArobust nucleus of the arcopalliumSONSPNsuperior olivary nucleussuperior paraolivary nucleusVCNventral cochlear nucleusventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscusVNLL

Identifiers

PMID23726970
PMCPMC3818289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.