Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23726216›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2013

Higher-status occupations and breast cancer: a life-course stress approach.

Tetyana Pudrovska, Deborah Carr, Michael McFarland, Caitlyn Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Influence of occupational stress on breast cancer incidence in the Women's Health Initiative.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phenotype Discovery and Geographic Disparities of Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis across U.S. Counties: A Machine Learning Approach.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tetyana PudrovskaDepartment of Sociology & Crime, Law, and Justice, Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. tup3@psu.edu
Deborah Carr
Michael McFarland
Caitlyn Collins

Funding

WORK, HEALTH, AND WELL-BEINGP01AG021079 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HAUSER, ROBERT M. · 2002 to 2011
$14.2M
Aging Together: Brothers and Sisters of the Wisconsin Longitudinal StudyR01AG033285 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HERD, PAMELA, WARREN, JOHN ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$11.8M
Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI LANDALE, NANCY S · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
Career Development Program in Women's Health Research at Penn StateK12HD055882 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WEISMAN, CAROL S · 2007 to 2016
$4.7M
Childhood Socioeconomic Status and Late-Life Mortality: Sex and Race DifferencesR03AG040037 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI PUDROVSKA, TETYANA · 2011 to 2012
$122k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG021079NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033285NIA NIH HHS R03 AG040037NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055882NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the 1957-2011 data from 3682 White non-Hispanic women (297 incident breast cancer cases) in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, United States, we explore the effect of occupation in 1975 (at age 36) on breast cancer incidence up to age 72. Our study is motivated by the paradoxical association between higher-status occupations and elevated breast cancer risk, which presents a challenge to the consistent health advantage of higher social class. We found that women in professional occupations had 72122% and women in managerial occupations had 57-89% higher risk of a breast cancer diagnosis than housewives and women in lower-status occupations. We explored an estrogen-related pathway (reproductive history, health behaviors, and life-course estrogen cycle) as well as a social stress pathway (occupational experiences) as potential explanations for the effect of higher-status occupations. The elevated risk of breast cancer among professional women was partly explained by estrogen-related variables but remained large and statistically significant. The association between managerial occupations and breast cancer incidence was fully explained by job authority defined as control over others' work. Exercising job authority was related to higher breast cancer risk (HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.18), especially with longer duration of holding the professional/managerial job. We suggest that the assertion of job authority by women in the 1970s involved stressful interpersonal experiences that may have promoted breast cancer development via prolonged dysregulation of the glucocorticoid system and exposure of the breast tissue to adverse effects of chronically elevated cortisol. Our study emphasizes complex biosocial pathways through which women's gendered occupational experiences become embodied and drive forward physiological repercussions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEmploymentFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedOccupationsRisk AssessmentStress, PsychologicalWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID23726216
PMCPMC3982384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.