Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23725849›Full record

ArticleTwin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies2013

Medical record validation of maternal recall of pregnancy and birth events from a twin cohort.

Jianghong Liu, Catherine Tuvblad, Linda Li, Adrian Raine, Laura A Baker

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianghong LiuSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jhliu@nursing.upenn.edu
Catherine Tuvblad
Linda Li
Adrian Raine
Laura A Baker

Funding

Mechanisms that mediate the link between lead exposure and child behavior problemK02ES019878 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LIU, JIANGHONG · 2011 to 2015
$656k
NIEHS NIH HHS K02 ES019878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the validity of maternal recall for several perinatal variables 8-10 years after pregnancy in a twin sample. Retrospective information was collected 8-10 years after the delivery event in a cohort of mothers from the University of Southern California Twin Study (N = 611) and compared with medical records for validity analysis. Recall of most variables showed substantial to perfect agreement (κ = 0.60-1.00), with notable exceptions for specific medical problems during pregnancy (κ ≤ 0.40) and substance use when mothers provided continuous data (e.g., number of cigarettes per day; r ≤ 0.24). With the exception of delivery method, neonatal intensive care unit admission, birth weight, neonatal information, and post-delivery complications were also recalled with low accuracy. For mothers of twins, maternal recall is generally a valid measure for perinatal variables 10 years after pregnancy. However, caution should be taken regarding variables such as substance use, medical problems, birth length, and post-delivery complications.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsMental RecallPregnancy ComplicationsReproductive HistoryTwinsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy, TwinRetrospective StudiesValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23725849
PMCPMC4255463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.