Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23725295›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants & redox signaling2014

An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation.

Katherine R Parzych, Daniel J Klionsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,383 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,383citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
27.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,383 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,470 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genes, fuel, and fate in lung cancer.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1,323 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine R ParzychDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniel J Klionsky
University of Michigan · US

Funding

ALTERNATIVE VACUOLAR TARGETING MECHANISMS IN YEASTR01GM053396 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KLIONSKY, DANIEL J. · 1995 to 2018
$12.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceAutophagy is a highly conserved eukaryotic cellular recycling process. Through the degradation of cytoplasmic organelles, proteins, and macromolecules, and the recycling of the breakdown products, autophagy plays important roles in cell survival and maintenance. Accordingly, dysfunction of this process contributes to the pathologies of many human diseases. RECENT ADVANCES: Extensive research is currently being done to better understand the process of autophagy. In this review, we describe current knowledge of the morphology, molecular mechanism, and regulation of mammalian autophagy. CRITICAL ISSUES: At the mechanistic and regulatory levels, there are still many unanswered questions and points of confusion that have yet to be resolved. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Through further research, a more complete and accurate picture of the molecular mechanism and regulation of autophagy will not only strengthen our understanding of this significant cellular process, but will aid in the development of new treatments for human diseases in which autophagy is not functioning properly.

Indexed as

PathologyAnimalsAutophagyCell SurvivalHumans

Identifiers

PMID23725295
PMCPMC3894687
OpenAlexW2089728480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.