Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23725015›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

The genome and transcriptome of the pine saprophyte Ophiostoma piceae, and a comparison with the bark beetle-associated pine pathogen Grosmannia clavigera.

Sajeet Haridas, Ye Wang, Lynette Lim, Sepideh Massoumi Alamouti, Shaun Jackman, Rod Docking, Gordon Robertson, Inanc Birol, Jörg Bohlmann, Colette Breuil

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Generic boundaries in theStudies in mycology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome Analysis of the Broad Host Range NecrotrophFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Antifungal Effects of Citral onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A new species ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. An Overview of Genes FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sajeet HaridasDepartment of Wood Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. colette.breuil@ubc.ca
Ye Wang
Lynette Lim
Sepideh Massoumi Alamouti
Shaun Jackman
Rod Docking
Gordon Robertson
Inanc Birol
Jörg Bohlmann
Colette Breuil
University of British Columbia · CACanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOphiostoma piceae is a wood-staining fungus that grows in the sapwood of conifer logs and lumber. We sequenced its genome and analyzed its transcriptomes under a range of growth conditions. A comparison with the genome and transcriptomes of the mountain pine beetle-associated pathogen Grosmannia clavigera highlights differences between a pathogen that colonizes and kills living pine trees and a saprophyte that colonizes wood and the inner bark of dead trees.

resultsWe assembled a 33 Mbp genome in 45 scaffolds, and predicted approximately 8,884 genes. The genome size and gene content were similar to those of other ascomycetes. Despite having similar ecological niches, O. piceae and G. clavigera showed no large-scale synteny. We identified O. piceae genes involved in the biosynthesis of melanin, which causes wood discoloration and reduces the commercial value of wood products. We also identified genes and pathways involved in growth on simple carbon sources and in sapwood, O. piceae's natural substrate. Like the pathogen, the saprophyte is able to tolerate terpenes, which are a major class of pine tree defense compounds; unlike the pathogen, it cannot utilize monoterpenes as a carbon source.

conclusionsThis work makes available the second annotated genome of a softwood ophiostomatoid fungus, and suggests that O. piceae's tolerance to terpenes may be due in part to these chemicals being removed from the cells by an ABC transporter that is highly induced by terpenes. The data generated will provide the research community with resources for work on host-vector-fungus interactions for wood-inhabiting, beetle-associated saprophytes and pathogens.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsColeopteraGenome, FungalMannoseMolecular Sequence AnnotationOleic AcidOphiostomaPinusSpecies SpecificityTriglyceridesWoodMannoseOleic AcidTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID23725015
PMCPMC3680317
OpenAlexW2056399598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.