Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23724867›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2013

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma.

Jedd D Wolchok, Harriet Kluger, Margaret K Callahan, Michael A Postow, Naiyer A Rizvi, Alexander M Lesokhin, Neil H Segal, Charlotte E Ariyan, Ruth-Ann Gordon, Kathleen Reed and 14 more

Erratum issued 14 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 14 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2,184 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,184citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01024231 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1b, Open-label, Multicenter, Multidose, Dose-escalation Study of BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) in Combination With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2009 to 2019Enrolled127ConditionsMalignant MelanomaArmsBMS-936558 (MDX1106-04), Ipilimumab
NCT02460068 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Phase III Study of Fotemustine Versus the Combination of Fotemustine and Ipilimumab or the Combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma With Brain Metastasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorItalian Network for Tumor Biotherapy FoundationRan2012 to 2020Enrolled168ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsFotemustine, Fotemustine and Ipilimumab, Ipilimumab and nivolumab
NCT02661685 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

An Immunotherapy for Metastatic Cancer Patients by Adoptive Transfer of Autologous IKDC-like Cells - Phase 1 Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Defense Medical Center, TaiwanRan2016 to 2019Enrolled6ConditionsNeoplasm MetastasisArmsautologous IKDC-like cells
NCT02681302 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Phase Ib-IIA Study of Combined Check Point Inhibition After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients at High Risk for Post-transplant Recurrence

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2016 to 2024Enrolled46ConditionsMultiple Myeloma, LymphomaArmsIpilimumab, Nivolumab
NCT02766582 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Open Label Nonrandomized Trial of the Anti PD 1 Therapy Pembrolizumab With First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy Followed by 12 Months Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Patients With Stage III/IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2016 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsOvarian CancerArmsPembrolizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel
NCT02846376 phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase I Study of Single-agent and Combined Checkpoint Inhibition After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients at High Risk for Post-transplant Recurrence

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2019 to 2023Enrolled8ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic SyndromeArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab
NCT02914405 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I Study of 131-1 mIBG Followed by Nivolumab and Dinutuximab Beta in Children With Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2026Enrolled44ConditionsNeuroblastomaArmsNivolumab, Ch14.18/CHO
NCT04441138 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of Concurrent, Split Course Chemoradiation Followed by Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Poor Risk and/or Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsStage III Non-small-cell Lung CancerArmsDurvalumab
NCT04663126 early_phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility of IV Injected Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like Tumour Associated Macrophages in Metastatic Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohn O. PriorRan2021 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsMelanomaArmsTc-99m tilmanocept
NCT04765709 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

BRIDGE Trial: Phase II Trial of durvalumaB and chemotheRapy Induction Followed by Durvalumab and Radiotherapy in larGe volumE Stage III NSCLC

TypeinterventionalSponsorMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchRan2021 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIArmsdurvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus vinorelbine or pemetrexed), Durvalumab plus radiotherapy, durvalumab
NCT04787991 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Open-label, ExploRatory Platform Trial to EValuate ImmunOtherapy Combinations With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With PreviousLy UnTreated MetastatIc Pancreatic AdenOcarciNoma (REVOLUTION)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Insight, LLCRan2021 to 2025Enrolled45ConditionsMetastatic Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaArmsNivolumab (Cohort A), Ipilimumab (Cohort A, B and C), Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (Cohort B), Nab-paclitaxel (nP) (Cohort A, B and C), Gemcitabine (gem) (Cohort A, B and C)
NCT04988945 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Sequential TransArterial Chemoembolization and Stereotactic RadioTherapy Followed by Durvalumab (MEDI4736) and Tremelimumab for Downstaging Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Hepatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2020 to 2026Enrolled33ConditionsHCCArmsTACE, SBRT, Durvalumab, Tremelimumab
NCT05088889 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Maintenance Ipilimumab + Nivolumab Post Induction Chemotherapy + SBRT for First Line

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheba Medical CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsStage IV Pancreatic CancerArmsNivolumab, ipilimumab, Stereotactic body radiation therapy, Low dose irradiation
NCT05568212 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase II, Two-cohorts, Randomized Trial Comparing Standard of Care Versus Immune- Based Combination in Relapsed Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Pretreated With Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab (MEDI4736)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Ricerca TraslazionaleRan2022 to 2027Enrolled176ConditionsNon-small-cell Lung Cancer PatientsArmsDurvalumab, Olaparib tablet, Single-agent chemotherapy, Platinum doublet chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,184 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

2,124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jedd D WolchokMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. wolchokj@mskcc.org
Harriet Kluger
Margaret K Callahan
Michael A Postow
Naiyer A Rizvi
Alexander M Lesokhin
Neil H Segal
Charlotte E Ariyan
Ruth-Ann Gordon
Kathleen Reed
Matthew M Burke
Anne Caldwell
Stephanie A Kronenberg
Blessing U Agunwamba
Xiaoling Zhang
Israel Lowy
Hector David Inzunza
William Feely
Christine E Horak
Quan Hong
Alan J Korman
Jon M Wigginton
Ashok Gupta
Mario Sznol

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
A research and training program for junior clinicians in treating metastatic melaK24CA172123 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KLUGER, HARRIET M. · 2013 to 2017
$780k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA172123NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with melanoma, ipilimumab (an antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4]) prolongs overall survival, and nivolumab (an antibody against the programmed death 1 [PD-1] receptor) produced durable tumor regression in a phase 1 trial. On the basis of their distinct immunologic mechanisms of action and supportive preclinical data, we conducted a phase 1 trial of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

methodsWe administered intravenous doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab alone every 3 weeks for 4 doses (concurrent regimen). The combined treatment was subsequently administered every 12 weeks for up to 8 doses. In a sequenced regimen, patients previously treated with ipilimumab received nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 48 doses.

resultsA total of 53 patients received concurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, and 33 received sequenced treatment. The objective-response rate (according to modified World Health Organization criteria) for all patients in the concurrent-regimen group was 40%. Evidence of clinical activity (conventional, unconfirmed, or immune-related response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks) was observed in 65% of patients. At the maximum doses that were associated with an acceptable level of adverse events (nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight and ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram), 53% of patients had an objective response, all with tumor reduction of 80% or more. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the concurrent-regimen group but were qualitatively similar to previous experience with monotherapy and were generally reversible. Among patients in the sequenced-regimen group, 18% had grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy and the objective-response rate was 20%.

conclusionsConcurrent therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab had a manageable safety profile and provided clinical activity that appears to be distinct from that in published data on monotherapy, with rapid and deep tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01024231.).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNivolumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCTLA-4 AntigenIpilimumabNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID23724867
PMCPMC5698004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 8 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.