SynthesisPloS one2013
The effect of copayments for prescriptions on adherence to prescription medicines in publicly insured populations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic umbrella review of the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Medication adherence influencing factors-an (updated) overview of systematic reviews.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Factors influencing adherence in Hepatitis-C infected patients: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Pooled it
- Medicare Advantage Benefits Design and Access to Cardiovascular Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Adelphi Adherence Questionnaire (ADAQ©) in a type 2 diabetes mellitus population as a new measure of adherence and the complex factors influencing adherence in routine care.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Understanding Treatment Adherence in Chronic Diseases: Challenges, Consequences, and Strategies for Improvement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Health Outcome Changes in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes After a State-Level Insulin Copayment Cap.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The Impact of a Medication Therapy Management Service on the Outcomes of Hypertension Treatment Follow-Up Care in an Ethiopian Tertiary Hospital: A Pre-Post Interventional Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2024Article
- Liraglutide 3.0 mg and mental health: can psychiatric symptoms be associated to adherence to therapy? Insights from a clinical audit.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2023Article
- Understanding conflicts of interest in rational drug prescription in a developing country: A stakeholder analysis, healthcare guidelines and ethical public health issues.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- What affected UK adults' adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2023Article
- Real price of health-experiences of out-of-pocket costs in Australia: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in insulin initiation among individuals with type 2 diabetes - A quasi-experimental nationwide register study.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Effect of the full coverage policy of essential medicines on medication adherence: A quasi-experimental study in Taizhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcome and Medical Cost of Originator and Generic Antihypertensive Drugs: A Population-Based Study in Yinzhou, China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Differential Cost-Sharing Undermines Treatment Adherence to Combination Therapy: Evidence from Diabetes Treatment.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Article
- Influence of Pharmaceutical Copayment on Emergency Hospital Admissions: A 1978-2018 Time Series Analysis in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCopayments are intended to decrease third party expenditure on pharmaceuticals, particularly those regarded as less essential. However, copayments are associated with decreased use of all medicines. Publicly insured populations encompass some vulnerable patient groups such as older individuals and low income groups, who may be especially susceptible to medication non-adherence when required to pay. Non-adherence has potential consequences of increased morbidity and costs elsewhere in the system.
objectiveTo quantify the risk of non-adherence to prescribed medicines in publicly insured populations exposed to copayments.
methodsThe population of interest consisted of cohorts who received public health insurance. The intervention was the introduction of, or an increase, in copayment. The outcome was non-adherence to medications, evaluated using objective measures. Eight electronic databases and the grey literature were systematically searched for relevant articles, along with hand searches of references in review articles and the included studies. Studies were quality appraised using modified EPOC and EHPPH checklists. A random effects model was used to generate the meta-analysis in RevMan v5.1. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) test; p>0.1 indicated a lack of heterogeneity.
resultsSeven out of 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies contributed more than 1 result to the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 199,996 people overall; 74,236 people in the copayment group and 125,760 people in the non-copayment group. Average age was 71.75 years. In the copayment group, (verses the non-copayment group), the odds ratio for non-adherence was 1.11 (95% CI 1.09-1.14; P = <0.00001). An acceptable level of heterogeneity at I(2) = 7%, (p = 0.37) was observed.
conclusionThis meta-analysis showed an 11% increased odds of non-adherence to medicines in publicly insured populations where copayments for medicines are necessary. Policy-makers should be wary of potential negative clinical outcomes resulting from non-adherence, and also possible knock-on economic repercussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.