Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23724050›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Clinical follow-up of responses to treatment with benznidazol in Amazon: a cohort study of acute Chagas disease.

Ana Yecê das Neves Pinto, Vera da Costa Valente, José Rodrigues Coura, Sebastião Aldo da Silva Valente, Angela Cristina Veríssimo Junqueira, Laura Cristina Santos, Alberto Gomes Ferreira, Roberto Cavalleiro de Macedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genotypes and Variants of BKPyV in Organ Donors after Brain Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Yecê das Neves PintoClinical epidemiologic Department of Evandro Chagas Institute-SOAMU-IEC-Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde/Brazil Ministery Health-SVS/MS, Belém, Pará, Brazil. ayece@iec.pa.gov.br
Vera da Costa Valente
José Rodrigues Coura
Sebastião Aldo da Silva Valente
Angela Cristina Veríssimo Junqueira
Laura Cristina Santos
Alberto Gomes Ferreira
Roberto Cavalleiro de Macedo
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRAmazon Research Foundation · BRInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRSanta Casa Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 179 individuals with acute Chagas disease mainly transmitted by oral source, from Pará and Amapá State, Amazonian, Brazil were included during the period from 1988 to 2005. Blood samples were used to survey peripheral blood for T. cruzi hemoparasites by quantitative buffy coat (QBC), indirect xenodiagnosis, blood culture and serology to detection of total IgM and anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and indirect hemagglutination assay (HA). All assays were performed pre-treatment (0 days) and repeated 35 (±7) and 68 (±6) days after the initiation of treatment with benznidazol and every 6 months while remained seropositive. The endpoint of collection was performed in 2005. Total medium period of follow-up per person was 5.6 years. Also, a blood sample was collected from 72 randomly chosen treated patients to perform polimerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Proportions of subjects with negative or positive serology according to the number of years after treatment were compared. In the endpoint of follow-up we found 47 patients (26.7%) serologically negative, therefore considered cured and 5 (2.7%) exhibited mild cardiac Chagas disease. Other 132 patients had persistent positive serologic tests. The PCR carried out in 72 individuals was positive in 9.8%. Added, there was evidence of therapeutic failure immediately following treatment, as demonstrated by xenodiagnosis and blood culture methods in 2.3% and 3.5% of cases, respectively. There was a strong evidence of antibody clearing in the fourth year after treatment and continuous decrease of antibody titers. Authors suggest that control programs should apply operational researches with new drug interventions four years after the acute phase for those treated patients with persistently positive serology.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ProtozoanBrazilChagas CardiomyopathyChagas DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin GMiddle AgedNitroimidazolesAntibodies, ProtozoanbenzonidazoleImmunoglobulin GNitroimidazolesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID23724050
PMCPMC3664625
OpenAlexW2007619268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.