Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23724021›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Phase 1b randomized trial and follow-up study in Uganda of the blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate BK-SE36.

Nirianne Marie Q Palacpac, Edward Ntege, Adoke Yeka, Betty Balikagala, Nahoko Suzuki, Hiroki Shirai, Masanori Yagi, Kazuya Ito, Wakaba Fukushima, Yoshio Hirota and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-Analysis of Human Antibodies AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Malaria Vaccines: Progress to Date.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  13. African-specific polymorphisms inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of MixedCancers · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nirianne Marie Q PalacpacDepartment of Molecular Protozoology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Edward Ntege
Adoke Yeka
Betty Balikagala
Nahoko Suzuki
Hiroki Shirai
Masanori Yagi
Kazuya Ito
Wakaba Fukushima
Yoshio Hirota
Christopher Nsereko
Takuya Okada
Bernard N Kanoi
Kohhei Tetsutani
Nobuko Arisue
Sawako Itagaki
Takahiro Tougan
Ken J Ishii
Shigeharu Ueda
Thomas G Egwang
Toshihiro Horii
Osaka University · JPOsaka City University · JPLira Hospital · UGMakerere University · UGNational Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to now a malaria vaccine remains elusive. The Plasmodium falciparum serine repeat antigen-5 formulated with aluminum hydroxyl gel (BK-SE36) is a blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate that has undergone phase 1a trial in malaria-naive Japanese adults. We have now assessed the safety and immunogenicity of BK-SE36 in a malaria endemic area in Northern Uganda.

methodsWe performed a two-stage, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial (Current Controlled trials ISRCTN71619711). A computer-generated sequence randomized healthy subjects for 2 subcutaneous injections at 21-day intervals in Stage1 (21-40 year-olds) to 1-mL BK-SE36 (BKSE1.0) (n = 36) or saline (n = 20) and in Stage2 (6-20 year-olds) to BKSE1.0 (n = 33), 0.5-mL BK-SE36 (BKSE0.5) (n = 33), or saline (n = 18). Subjects and laboratory personnel were blinded. Safety and antibody responses 21-days post-second vaccination (Day42) were assessed. Post-trial, to compare the risk of malaria episodes 130-365 days post-second vaccination, Stage2 subjects were age-matched to 50 control individuals.

resultsNearly all subjects who received BK-SE36 had induration (Stage1, n = 33, 92%; Stage2, n = 63, 96%) as a local adverse event. No serious adverse event related to BK-SE36 was reported. Pre-existing anti-SE36 antibody titers negatively correlated with vaccination-induced antibody response. At Day42, change in antibody titers was significant for seronegative adults (1.95-fold higher than baseline [95% CI, 1.56-2.43], p = 0.004) and 6-10 year-olds (5.71-fold [95% CI, 2.38-13.72], p = 0.002) vaccinated with BKSE1.0. Immunogenicity response to BKSE0.5 was low and not significant (1.55-fold [95% CI, 1.24-1.94], p = 0.75). In the ancillary analysis, cumulative incidence of first malaria episodes with ≥5000 parasites/µL was 7 cases/33 subjects in BKSE1.0 and 10 cases/33 subjects in BKSE0.5 vs. 29 cases/66 subjects in the control group. Risk ratio for BKSE1.0 was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24-0.98; p = 0.04).

conclusionBK-SE36 is safe and immunogenic. The promising potential of BK-SE36, observed in the follow-up study, warrants a double-blind phase 1/2b trial in children under 5 years.

trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN71619711.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesAdultAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumTreatment OutcomeUgandaVaccinationYoung AdultAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanMalaria Vaccinesserine repeat antigen 5, Plasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID23724021
PMCPMC3665850
OpenAlexW2169030260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.