Draft Genome Sequence of Agrobacterium sp. Strain UHFBA-218, Isolated from Rhizosphere Soil of Crown Gall-Infected Cherry Rootstock Colt.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm N-acetyl-L-cysteine Grafted Siloxane Polymers with Potential for Use in Water Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
   Article
2. Fish Gut Microbiome: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives.Indian journal of microbiology · 2018
   Article
3. Survey of (Meta)genomic Approaches for Understanding Microbial Community Dynamics.Indian journal of microbiology · 2017
   Review
4. Thermodynamically optimal whole-genome tiling microarray design and validation.BMC research notes · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract