Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23722211›Full record

ReviewNature methods2013

Mapping brain circuitry with a light microscope.

Pavel Osten, Troy W Margrie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pavel OstenCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA. osten@cshl.edu
Troy W Margrie
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cell adhesion molecules in autism: a whole-brain study of genetic mouse modelsR01MH096946 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI OSTEN, PAVEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
Medical Research Council MC U1175975156NIMH NIH HHS 1R01MH096946-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096946Wellcome Trust 096436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beginning of the 21st century has seen a renaissance in light microscopy and anatomical tract tracing that together are rapidly advancing our understanding of the form and function of neuronal circuits. The introduction of instruments for automated imaging of whole mouse brains, new cell type–specific and trans-synaptic tracers, and computational methods for handling the whole-brain data sets has opened the door to neuroanatomical studies at an unprecedented scale. We present an overview of the present state and future opportunities in charting long-range and local connectivity in the entire mouse brain and in linking brain circuits to function.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingMiceMicroscopySynapses

Identifiers

PMID23722211
PMCPMC3982327
OpenAlexW2061490418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.