Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23721413›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2013

Provision of long-acting reversible contraception in HIV-prevalent countries: results from nationally representative surveys in southern Africa.

J Morse, T Chipato, K Blanchard, T Nhemachena, G Ramjee, C McCulloch, M Blum, E Saleeby, C C Harper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge, beliefs and practices of nurses with long-acting reversible contraception, Cape Town.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating the impact of social franchising on family planning use in Kenya.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

J MorseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
T Chipato
K Blanchard
T Nhemachena
G Ramjee
C McCulloch
M Blum
E Saleeby
C C Harper
Ibis Reproductive Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USDuke University · USReproductive Science Center · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

Providers'perceptions of the diaphragm in Southern Afr*R01HD046027 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI HARPER, CYNTHIA C · 2003 to 2005
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse the current provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and clinician training needs in HIV-prevalent settings.

designNationally representative survey of clinicians.

settingHIV-prevalent settings in South Africa and Zimbabwe. POPULATION: Clinicians in South Africa and Zimbabwe.

methodsNationally representative surveys of clinicians were conducted in South Africa and Zimbabwe (n = 1444) to assess current clinical practice in the provision of LARC in HIV-prevalent settings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse contraceptive provision and clinician training needs.

main outcome measureMultivariable logistic regression of contraceptive provision and clinician training needs.

resultsProvision of the most effective reversible contraceptives is limited: only 14% of clinicians provide copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), 4% levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs and 16% contraceptive implants. Clinicians' perceptions of patient eligibility for IUD use were overly restrictive, especially related to HIV risks. Less than 5% reported that IUDs were appropriate for women at high risk of HIV or for HIV-positive women, contrary to evidence-based guidelines. Only 15% viewed implants as appropriate for women at risk of HIV. Most clinicians (82%), however, felt that IUDs were underused by patients, and over half desired additional training on LARC methods. Logistic regression analysis showed that LARC provision was largely restricted to physicians, hospital settings and urban areas. Results also showed that clinicians in rural areas and clinics, including nurses, were especially interested in training.

conclusionsClinician competency in LARC provision is important in southern Africa, given the low use of methods and high rates of unintended pregnancy among HIV-positive and at-risk women. Despite low provision, clinician interest is high, suggesting the need for increased evidence-based training in LARC to reduce unintended pregnancy and associated morbidities.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceContraceptive Devices, FemaleFemaleGuideline AdherenceHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeeds AssessmentPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Nurses'HIVimplantable contraceptionintrauterine devicelong-acting reversible contraceptionSouth AfricaZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID23721413
PMCPMC3775997
OpenAlexW2092169714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.